On 09.07.2012 19:13, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 6/22/2012 2:37 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hi,
there are build breakers on all three platforms
- Windows7
in shell_2:
has ./configure: line 7952: test: : integer expression expected
./configure: line 7957: test: : integer expression expected
On 09.07.2012 19:03, Andrew Rist wrote:
an update on this...
The Win buildbot is now on VS 2008, and building the same as the
unofficial dev builds - the build runs through fine - the only issue
left is that I can't find the install bits...
do I need to run another step to generate them?
The
On 06.07.2012 17:30, Tsutomu Uchino wrote:
2012/7/6 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Here is a quick update on the status of the buildbots:
- Windows7 still breaks because it attempts to use the compiler from Visual
Studio 2010 instead of the officially supported one from 2008.
- Linux 32bit is
Subject:Re: [BUILDBOT] build breakers
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 10:45:35 +0200
From: Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de
Reply-To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Here is a quick update on the status of the buildbots:
- Windows7 still breaks because
On 6/22/2012 2:37 AM, Andre Fischer wrote:
Hi,
there are build breakers on all three platforms
- Windows7
in shell_2:
has ./configure: line 7952: test: : integer expression expected
./configure: line 7957: test: : integer expression expected
./configure: line 7962: test: : integer
2012/7/6 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de:
Here is a quick update on the status of the buildbots:
- Windows7 still breaks because it attempts to use the compiler from Visual
Studio 2010 instead of the officially supported one from 2008.
- Linux 32bit is OK.
- Linux 64bit has a strange, Java
A week has passed and the build bots still fail with the same messages
(well, thanks to Herbert the Windows7 bot shows a slightly more helpful
message for the same problem.)
Five minutes ago I found and fixed a typo in the area of the Linux
problem. That will not fix the failing test but
I just check-out the latest revision from svn server. I will start to make
a full build on Mac/Suse/Windows. I will report the details if I meet a
build break.
2012/6/29 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de
A week has passed and the build bots still fail with the same messages
(well, thanks to Herbert
On 29.06.2012 09:39, Chao Huang wrote:
I just check-out the latest revision from svn server. I will start to make
a full build on Mac/Suse/Windows. I will report the details if I meet a
build break.
That would be great. Thanks.
-Andre
2012/6/29 Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de
A week has
I don't know here which distribution linux32 refers to. Our build on
SuSe 11.1 breaks on serf 1.1 because it has a new dependency on
libexpat.so, we resolved it by installing the libexpat-devel rpm
package.
zhangjf
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
Hi,
On 29.06.2012 10:42, zhangjf wrote:
I don't know here which distribution linux32 refers to. Our build on
SuSe 11.1 breaks on serf 1.1 because it has a new dependency on
libexpat.so, we resolved it by installing the libexpat-devel rpm
package.
That should only be necessary if you are using
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
On 29.06.2012 10:42, zhangjf wrote:
I don't know here which distribution linux32 refers to. Our build on
SuSe 11.1 breaks on serf 1.1 because it has a new dependency on
libexpat.so, we resolved it by installing
Except that, we don't have more problems. Actual we already had
success builds (r1355082) on Windows XP (vs2008 pro w/ cygwin), Suse
11.1, Ubuntu 11.04, MacOS 10.6 today. From the above linux 64 and Win7
error message, I am wondering if it needs a fresh autoconf. We saw
similar error messages in
The full build broke on Mac OS X 10.6.8.
MacOSX 10.6.8
gcc version 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5666) (dot 3)
java version
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
On 29.06.2012 10:42, zhangjf wrote:
I don't know here which distribution linux32 refers to. Our build on
SuSe 11.1 breaks on serf
Hi Chao Huang,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com wrote:
The full build broke on Mac OS X 10.6.8.
MacOSX 10.6.8
On 29.06.2012 11:07, Chao Huang wrote:
/Users/hchao/Apache/build/aoo.340.20120629/code/ext_sources/377a60170e5185eb63d3ed2fae98e621-README_silgraphite-2.3.1.txt.part
Can't locate object method show_progress via package LWP::UserAgent at
This sounds like the problem mentioned in [1] and in
Hi,
2012/6/29 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org:
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
On 29.06.2012 10:42, zhangjf wrote:
I don't know here which distribution linux32 refers to. Our build on
SuSe 11.1 breaks on serf 1.1 because it has a new
hi, Ariel
Thanks for your reminder.
I will update my local dev env, which is OK to build R1343441 on
Windows/Mac/Ubuntu/Suse.
2012/6/29 Ariel Constenla-Haile arie...@apache.org
Hi Chao Huang,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:07 AM, Chao Huang chao.de...@gmail.com wrote:
The full build broke on
Hi Tsutomu,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Tsutomu Uchino hanya.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Revision 1351981 broke rev. 1341713, now no patches are applied at all:
make writeable...
no patch needed...
touch ./unxlngx6/misc/build/so_patched_so_serf
mkdir ./unxlngx6/misc/build/serf-1.1.0/
I
On 29.06.2012 11:08, zhangjf wrote:
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
arie...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 5:50 AM, Andre Fischer a...@a-w-f.de wrote:
On 29.06.2012 10:42, zhangjf wrote:
I don't know here which distribution linux32 refers to. Our
On 29.06.2012 11:23, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
Hi Tsutomu,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 6:18 AM, Tsutomu Uchino hanya.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Revision 1351981 broke rev. 1341713, now no patches are applied at all:
make writeable...
no patch needed...
touch ./unxlngx6/misc/build/so_patched_so_serf
On 22.06.2012 11:37, Andre Fischer wrote:
there are build breakers on all three platforms
- Windows7
[...]
could be caused by missing DLLs when the compiler is called to detect
its version. In that case cl does not print anything. I have seen
something similar when I tried to use the 2010 dev
Hi,
there are build breakers on all three platforms
- Windows7
in shell_2:
has ./configure: line 7952: test: : integer expression expected
./configure: line 7957: test: : integer expression expected
./configure: line 7962: test: : integer expression expected
configure: error: Compiler too
24 matches
Mail list logo
