Re: [repo] External sources, ICU

2011-09-10 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 10.09.2011 16:54, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Mathias, On Saturday, 2011-09-10 00:11:55 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: If we can be sure about the IP situation, we should at least add copyright headers to the files, shouldn't we? Or put a license file into the repository. I'm

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-09 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mathias, On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:42:25 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: ICU 4.0.1 we use also has regex. Sure, newest ICU probably improved there, but upgrading ICU in the past gave some surprises, especially regarding break iterators, that made it necessary to adapt some things. That

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-09 Thread Pedro Giffuni
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:11:16 +0200, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote: Hi Mathias, On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:42:25 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: ICU 4.0.1 we use also has regex. Sure, newest ICU probably improved there, but upgrading ICU in the past gave some surprises, especially regarding

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-09 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 09.09.2011 12:06, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Mathias, On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:33:59 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated, what issues with headers are you referring? I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but the

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU

2011-09-09 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mathias, On Friday, 2011-09-09 20:21:19 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: If we can be sure about the IP situation, we should at least add copyright headers to the files, shouldn't we? Or put a license file into the repository. I'm confused now. The breakiterator data files _have_ copyright

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU

2011-09-09 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 09.09.2011 21:11, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Mathias, On Friday, 2011-09-09 20:21:19 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: If we can be sure about the IP situation, we should at least add copyright headers to the files, shouldn't we? Or put a license file into the repository. I'm confused now.

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-08 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Pedro, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 20:32:38 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: There is also interest in using icu-regex for replacing the copyleft regex and the latest versions seem to have improved a lot. Of course, but upgrading ICU at this stage for a 3.4 release IMHO is not an

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-08 Thread Marcus (OOo)
Am 09/08/2011 05:32 AM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: --- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote: OK, I accept your reasoning. ... There is also interest in using icu-regex for replacing the copyleft regex and the latest versions seem to have improved a lot. Of course, but upgrading ICU at this

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-08 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 08.09.2011 02:41, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Pedro, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:19:50 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated, what issues with headers are you referring? I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but the

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-08 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 08.09.2011 13:30, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Pedro, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 20:32:38 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: There is also interest in using icu-regex for replacing the copyleft regex and the latest versions seem to have improved a lot. Of course, but upgrading ICU at

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-08 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
Hi; --- On Thu, 9/8/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Which version of ICU is used in LibreOffice? If they use a newer one, this probably can tell us about possible surprises. The FreeBSD port uses 4.8.1 (with local patches). so it looks like they use system icu already. I

[repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-07 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Pedro, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:24:26 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:46:17 +0200, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Am 07.09.2011 18:21, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: The external sources include a lot of stuff that is outdated and there may even be security

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-07 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote: I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated, what issues with headers are you referring?   Eike I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but the first ICU versions had a restrictive license. We have some code from ICU in

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU

2011-09-07 Thread Mathias Bauer
Am 07.09.2011 22:44, schrieb Eike Rathke: Hi Pedro, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:24:26 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote: On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:46:17 +0200, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote: Am 07.09.2011 18:21, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: The external sources include a lot of stuff

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU

2011-09-07 Thread Pedro F. Giffuni
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Mathias Bauer wrote: ... The IP of some of our i18n files is unclear and someone (you?) pointed out that they have been copied from ICU. We should clean that up. But that is not related to the ICU external tarball. Hmm.. I thought we could use the same headers

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU (was: Who wants to build OpenOffice?)

2011-09-07 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Pedro, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:19:50 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote: I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated, what issues with headers are you referring? I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but the first ICU versions had a restrictive license.

Re: [repo] External sources, ICU

2011-09-07 Thread Eike Rathke
Hi Mathias, On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 23:49:51 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote: I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated, what issues with headers are you referring? The IP of some of our i18n files is unclear and someone (you?) pointed out that they have been copied from