Hi Mathias;
--- On Fri, 9/9/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
>
> If we can be sure about the IP situation, we should at
> least add copyright headers to the files, shouldn't we?
> Or put a license file into the repository.
>
The standard Apache policy seems to be to add them to the
NOTICE file:
htt
Am 09.09.2011 12:06, schrieb Eike Rathke:
> Hi Mathias,
>
> On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:33:59 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>
>> >> > I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
>> >> > what "issues with headers" are you referring?
>> >>
>> >> I am not sure exactly when the ICU lic
Hi Eike;
--- On Fri, 9/9/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
> >
> > There was also a bug with Arab glyphs but it was not
> specific
> > to the icu version.
>
> Well, yes, for those exist patches in the icu module's
> directory, that's the easy case. What I was referring
> are changes in other modules becau
Hi Pedro,
On Friday, 2011-09-09 07:42:37 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> >>Which version of ICU is used in LibreOffice? If they use a newer
> >>one,
> >>this probably can tell us about possible "surprises".
> >
> >The internal ICU is 4.4.2, whether anything needed to be adapted I
> >don't
> >know.
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:11:16 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Mathias,
On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:42:25 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> ICU 4.0.1 we use also has regex. Sure, newest ICU probably
improved
> there, but upgrading ICU in the past gave some surprises,
especially
> regarding break iterat
Hi Mathias,
On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:42:25 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> > ICU 4.0.1 we use also has regex. Sure, newest ICU probably improved
> > there, but upgrading ICU in the past gave some surprises, especially
> > regarding break iterators, that made it necessary to adapt some things.
> >
Hi Mathias,
On Thursday, 2011-09-08 19:33:59 +0200, Mathias Bauer wrote:
> >> > I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
> >> > what "issues with headers" are you referring?
> >>
> >> I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but
> >> the first ICU versions had a rest
Hi;
--- On Thu, 9/8/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
>
> Which version of ICU is used in LibreOffice? If they use a
> newer one,
> this probably can tell us about possible "surprises".
>
The FreeBSD port uses 4.8.1 (with local patches). so it
looks like they use "system icu" already.
I have also se
Am 08.09.2011 13:30, schrieb Eike Rathke:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 20:32:38 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
>> > > There is also interest in using icu-regex for
>> > > replacing the copyleft regex and the latest
>> > > versions seem to have improved a lot.
>> >
>> > Of course,
Am 08.09.2011 02:41, schrieb Eike Rathke:
> Hi Pedro,
>
> On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:19:50 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
>> > I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
>> > what "issues with headers" are you referring?
>>
>> I am not sure exactly when the ICU license chang
Am 09/08/2011 05:32 AM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
OK, I accept your reasoning.
...
There is also interest in using icu-regex for
replacing the copyleft regex and the latest
versions seem to have improved a lot.
Of course, but upgrading ICU at this stag
Hi Pedro,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 20:32:38 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > > There is also interest in using icu-regex for
> > > replacing the copyleft regex and the latest
> > > versions seem to have improved a lot.
> >
> > Of course, but upgrading ICU at this stage for a 3.4
> > release IM
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
OK, I accept your reasoning.
...
>
> > There is also interest in using icu-regex for
> > replacing the copyleft regex and the latest
> > versions seem to have improved a lot.
>
> Of course, but upgrading ICU at this stage for a 3.4
> release IMHO is not an
Hi Pedro,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:19:50 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
> > what "issues with headers" are you referring?
>
> I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but
> the first ICU versions had a restrictive licen
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Eike Rathke wrote:
>
> I don't see why the current ICU 4.0.1 needed to be updated,
> what "issues with headers" are you referring?
>
> Eike
>
I am not sure exactly when the ICU license changed but
the first ICU versions had a restrictive license.
We have some code from IC
Hi Pedro,
On Wednesday, 2011-09-07 14:24:26 -0500, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 20:46:17 +0200, Mathias Bauer
> wrote:
> >Am 07.09.2011 18:21, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
> >>The external sources include a lot of stuff that is
> >>outdated and there may even be security risks involve
16 matches
Mail list logo
