Hi Claudio,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:46:26PM -0200, Claudio Filho wrote:
was more easy to migrate to LibO. Today, only René, a Debian
Developer, maintains the package there.
Thats not true. I do work on that too as is Lionel Elie Mamane and sometimes
Matthias Klose (for ARM). Rene is
Hi Bjoern
2012/1/13 Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com:
Thats not true. I do work on that too as is Lionel Elie Mamane and sometimes
Matthias Klose (for ARM). Rene is clearly the final judge on contributions and
changes to LibreOffice packaging on Debian as he is doing an
Hi,
Le 13 janv. 12 à 10:02, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit :
Hi Claudio,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:46:26PM -0200, Claudio Filho wrote:
was more easy to migrate to LibO. Today, only René, a Debian
Developer, maintains the package there.
Thats not true. I do work on that too as is Lionel Elie
On 1/13/12 1:03 PM, eric b wrote:
Hi,
Le 13 janv. 12 à 10:02, Bjoern Michaelsen a écrit :
Hi Claudio,
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 06:46:26PM -0200, Claudio Filho wrote:
was more easy to migrate to LibO. Today, only René, a Debian
Developer, maintains the package there.
Thats not true. I do
Hi Claudio,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:46:05AM -0200, Claudio Filho wrote:
Absolutely! I agree with you that René doing an excellent work and he
knows all inside the OOo/LibO packaging process!
Great to see we agree there!
What i (try) say is that we have a small number of people envolved in
Hi,
On 13.01.2012 14:25, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Claudio,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 09:46:05AM -0200, Claudio Filho wrote:
Absolutely! I agree with you that René doing an excellent work and he
knows all inside the OOo/LibO packaging process!
Great to see we agree there!
What i (try) say
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 02:54:27PM +0100, Andre Fischer wrote:
I can accept longwinding release cycles but not slow developement
velocity. After all Sun/Oracle has been the biggest contributor
for OpenOffice. LibreOffice is still integrating features made by
Sun/Oracle (it has
On 13.01.2012 15:37, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Hi Andre,
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 02:54:27PM +0100, Andre Fischer wrote:
I can accept longwinding release cycles but not slow developement
velocity. After all Sun/Oracle has been the biggest contributor
for OpenOffice. LibreOffice is still
Andre Fischer wrote:
Yes, as well as a higher code quality.
Metrics please, or didn't happen! ;)
Cheers from the off,
-- Thorsten
pgpGf0wXp2F6G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Hmm...
--- Ven 13/1/12, Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com ha scritto:
...
Well, no. After all, OpenOffice.org is not
dead. It just got a new home.
The project OpenOffice.org is dead, the trademark obviously
survived as it is currently owned by a different project
Hi
2012/1/8 Michael Stahl m...@openoffice.org:
in this case i guess it's at the discretion of the distributions which of
the 2 successors of the deceased OpenOffice.org they transition to (and
given the lack of a release from Apache OpenOffice it shouldn't surprise
anybody that currently
11 matches
Mail list logo
