On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
The question is why do we need this? I would think
all supported platforms have standard conformant
C/C++ libs.
Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions, apparently.
See external/glibc/makefile.mk. Apparently
Support for w_char matters to me, but that is unrelated to work here.
However, there's another place to look.
I know there are command-line utilities in Subversion releases, so I went
nosing around. There is an apr_lib.h reference and apr_getopt... calls. I
haven't found the library and its
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.4/apr__getopt_8h-source.html
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.developer.usingapi.html
On Sep 15, 2011, at 1:41 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Support for w_char matters to me, but that is unrelated to work here.
However, there's another place to look.
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:41:39 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Support for w_char matters to me, but that is unrelated to work here.
The idea is simply to replace some glibc routines in the stubs package.
If the gnu version supports w_char, then it matters, otherwise
Yes, apr_getopt calls in Subversion would come from one of those two
libraries.
If you need a minimal example I suggest subversion/svnversion/main.c and
subversion/tests/cmdline/atomic-ra-revprop-change.c.
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 13:41:39 -0700:
Support for w_char
Dave Fisher wrote on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 14:17:43 -0700:
http://apr.apache.org/docs/apr/1.4/apr__getopt_8h-source.html
http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.5/svn.developer.usingapi.html
That's an old/previous release of the book.
Also: http://subversion.apache.org/HACKING
On Sep 15, 2011,
On Sep 14, 2011, at 10:56 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
glibc-2.1.3 is under GNU GPL 2
Really? I think it is
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Copying.html#Copying GNU LGPL
2.1.
--
Pavel Janík
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
Where you have got this file?
--
Pavel Janík
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0200, Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz wrote:
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
Where you have got this file?
It appears listed as external source tarball in the
ApacheMigration wiki.
The question is
From: Pavel Janík pa...@janik.cz
Subject: Re: How to do with glibc-2.1.3 in AOOo?
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:26:53 +0200
On Sep 14, 2011, at 11:17 AM, Shao Zhi Zhao wrote:
unzip glibc-2.1.3-stub,open the file of COPYING,
Where you have got this file?
The question is why do we need this? I would think
all supported platforms have standard conformant
C/C++ libs.
Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions, apparently.
See external/glibc/makefile.mk. Apparently what's needed is getopt()
and readdir_r().
In the same line of
Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
...
The question is why do we need
this? I would think
all supported platforms have standard conformant
C/C++ libs.
Yeah, but the code uses non-standard library functions,
apparently.
Both of
On 14.09.2011 17:23, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Thanks Tor, this is all good to know!
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi
wrote:
The question is why do we need
this? I would think
all supported platforms have standard conformant C/C++ libs.
Yeah, but the code uses
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
In FreeBSD we were using an independent library in
some ports to
support getopt_long but the regular library now
supports the GNU
extensions. If it's needed it can be taken from
there.
if it's not in a C standard at least 20 years old
If you list the functions you have in mind, and the names of the headers
normally used to introduce their signatures, I will double-check the VC++ 2008
and VC++ 2010 libraries to see what the status is.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Michael Stahl [mailto:m...@openoffice.org]
Ahem ...
Guys;
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
...
If you list the functions you have in
mind, and the names of the headers normally used to
introduce their signatures, I will double-check the VC++
2008 and VC++ 2010 libraries to see what the status
Most stock implementations on Windows seem to have the original BSD license.
However, I found one that should work at
http://suacommunity.com/dictionary/getopt-entry.php. The getopt_source.zip
has two files, getopt.h and getopt_long.c, and the getopt_long.c licenses are
modified BSD (i.e.,
On Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:43:09 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Most stock implementations on Windows seem to have the original BSD
license.
Including MSVC in the search produces more specific results.
Mesa uses OpenBSD's version which is a 2 clause BSD license.
Apparently the getopt.h has been cleaned up in later OpenBSD, FreeBSD releases.
The Todd Miller 2002 getopt_long.c version is the same, so that looks like a
clear choice.
Thanks,
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Pedro Giffuni [mailto:giffu...@tutopia.com]
Sent: Wednesday,
Backing up a little. I don't know if the original BSD license is a problem for
Apache, but it becomes a problem downstream, so it is good to avoid having to
carry that license and a NOTICE file about it around in Apache OOo.
LESS RELEVANT: I've been looking for a good getopt( ) for my own use
--- On Wed, 9/14/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
..
Backing up a little. I don't
know if the original BSD license is a problem for Apache,
but it becomes a problem downstream, so it is good to avoid
having to carry that license and a NOTICE file about it
around in
On Thu, 15 Sep 2011 08:06:40 +0300, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
For command line options I think the normal char is enough
I don't know what the OOo code actually uses getopt() for (I am
pretty
sure it is just some build-time tools that actually use it...), but
you can be assured that
22 matches
Mail list logo
