--- On Wed, 6/15/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 06:10,
Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net
wrote:
Moin,
there are two things about building OOo that need to
be clarified.
Currently we use configure to set the build
environment. The way we are
While here, on a slightly different topic:
Some old promotional demos of SUN's OpenOffice carried
a nice set of fonts. Perhaps Oracle may make those
available? And if so, I wonder about the license for
those: ASL 2.0 would be fine but font licenses is
something I doubt anyone, except SIL, has
--- On Tue, 6/21/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
...
Thanks for looking and thanks for being brave enough to post
your opinions ;-).
So indeed nothing the LO developers have done has
observably improved the overall performance. The great thing
the LO developers did is the
--- On Wed, 6/22/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
(5) A header from GNU c library
hwpfilter/source/ksc5601.h
Are we allowed to use it in the build?
I looked this up and it appears to be part of an old
version of GNU libiconv. XFree86 also has a copy
under a liberal (MIT?)
Hello Mattias;
Can you (or any volunteer) please sort the list alphabetically?
It appears we depend on two copies of openssl.
Pedro.
Sounds fine to me ...
I do like to review the commit archives, even when I don't
subscribe there directly.
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
...
In light of this conversation I am
changing the proposal to this:
For both the Community Forum (OOOUSER) and
Disclaimer: I am no SVN expert but I play a lot with
FreeBSD's SVN repository.
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I'm no svn expert, but I hope to find some here.
We still have a lot of work in so called child workspaces
(in Mercurial they are just an own
(Sorry my previous message only went private)
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
(Snipped the irregexp stuff)
much better than writing our own ;-).
PCRE also has C++ wrappers, and *is* packaged up and
delivered as a library.
Hmm.. and it's documented:
--- On Thu, 6/23/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I was talking about the C++ wrappers that are part of PCRE
itself.
Ah didn't know about those ... no objection at all.
FWIW, since irregexp actually replaced PCRE in Chrome I
would expect it to be faster but then it also does some
--- On Fri, 6/24/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
From: Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net
Subject: Re: lp_solve replacement (future project)
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Date: Friday, June 24, 2011, 2:22 AM
Hi Pedro,
let me quote Niklas Nebel from the OOo dev list:
Just a thought here;
It would seem like the way to go about spell checking is to
go back to Myspell since it has a license we can use (I know,
it's waaay back!). Also, the hunspell dictionaries are
backwards compatible with Myspell so some people may
not notice the difference.
I can't find
--- On Tue, 6/28/11, Ted Rolle, Jr. ster...@gmail.com wrote:
I've seen both.
Good, that's what software freedom is about :-).
Is LibreOffice a fork of the OOO code?
Yes.
I don't know which one to choose.
This list is not really for comparisons among the
many OOo forks.
I am personally
--- On Wed, 6/29/11, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
...
Hi Pedro,
On Tuesday, 2011-06-28 09:43:12 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni
wrote:
FWIW, ICU 4.8 runs out of memory when building here.
How much (real+virtual) memory, which platform and
compiler?
Well, 2G RAM + 4G swap but I think
Hi again;
I went through Mathias' list of external source tarballs.
The idea is to make sure that most of that stuff was updated
in FreeBSD and while doing that I checked the licenses.
I found the following licenses missing from the
ApacheMigration list in the OOo wiki:
Name
FWIW;
One interesting difference that I see happening in the future
wrt LibreOffice is that Apache OpenOffice will be a big
consumer of Java stuff.
Apache PDFBox looks like a good candidate for inclusion.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Alexandro Colorado j...@openoffice.org wrote:
...
I can go to JIRA and find the feature list and compare it
with Bugzilla, and I can see there are some minor advantages,
Please do so :).
but I agree that the familiarity
of bugzilla is usually lower the learning
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Kai Ahrens kahr...@apache.org wrote:
From: Kai Ahrens kahr...@apache.org
Subject: Re: Some more strange files in the OOo code
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Cc: Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com
Date: Thursday, June 30, 2011, 2:47 AM
Hi,
Am 29.06.2011 23:05
--- On Thu, 6/30/11, Greg Stein gst...@gmail.com wrote:
...
wrote:
...
I think the first Apache release it will be a good
opportunity to do all the big API/ABI changes,
including
this. I think we should also use lucene 3.2, etc..
For my own education... what API we talking about here?
In general I avoid commenting threads like this, as in my
POV the licensing differences are not surmountable..
--- On Mon, 7/4/11, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
...
As each developer retains ownership of their code it
maybe better to ask
on the developers list [1]. The SC has no
--- On Mon, 7/4/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
In general I avoid commenting threads like this, as
in my POV the licensing differences are not
surmountable..
It is hard to tell whether 100% of TDF developers insist
on copyleft.
Certainly
Just to make sure we are actually advancing here...
1) Does Oracle-legal have a list of the files we want
relicensed? Is there a visible head on our side
for this process?
2) Let's decide the JIRA vs. Bugzilla issue voting.
(In a different thread).
One more shameless plug concerning (2): moving
Hello ...
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Drini Nosi drini.in...@gmail.com wrote:
...
As I read this thread, it makes me a
bit sad to see that the community of the OpenSourceOffice is
actually splitting in two, and I don't understand why.
Corporate interests. Some linux distributions and developers
were
I agree with Mathias ..
We are not advancing simply because it's not clear who does what.
- Greg made a script to import the Hg stuff ... who will run it?
- Matthias made a list, is this what Oracle should relicense, or
perhaps we should wait until we merge the resulting SVN branches.
- Who
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
I'd like to explore the technical feasibility of migrating
to JIRA.
+1
I see this page here describing the migration from JIRA's
perspective:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira/tour/bugzilla-importer.jsp
This appears
--- On Tue, 7/5/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
...
I doubt that this will complicate things too much. It
should be bearable.
I'm interested to read the opinions of those who favored
the get everything into svn at once approach.
All the history is valuable to avoid
during these years to free software.
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 7/6/11, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 7/5/2011 8:53 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
I agree with Mathias ..
We are not advancing simply because it's not clear who
does what.
- Greg made a script to import the Hg stuff ... who
will run
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
...
Hence the desire to see the work that has already been done
on LO contributed here, rather than a related-but-different
cleanup.
All these contributions are hypothetical ... at least
until we have a repository of our own. And
--- On Thu, 7/7/11, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
...
The original OpenOffice.org project is no more and that
there are now two projects taking the code forward. Seems
easy enough to understand and gives no scope for arguing
about who is to blame for what. And uses neither the word
Hi Rob:
Would the idea be to include the DITA Open Toolkit in
OpenOffice or to keep it as an external package?
I downloaded the minimal DITA Open Toolkit to explore
how to package it for FreeBSD, and it seems like it is
meant to be embedded into bigger applications, it
also includes some other
--- On Tue, 7/12/11, Jomar Silva homem...@gmail.com wrote:
...
On 2011/6/12 19:38 Pedro Giffuni wrote:
While this is understandable, it is not good enough.
We will have to find an alternative repository and
link to it from Apache's website. This is something
that can wait though.
Just thought I'd mention...
Looking at the initial LO-dev mail archive there are some nice
summaries of their first set of changes and in many cases they
include the OOo bugzilla ID:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2010-October/000311.html
Hi again;
--- On Tue, 6/21/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
some more strange files I found in the OOo code:
(1) boost/Regex_Experimental.tar.gz
Should be unpacked and committed or removed.
I know we basically agreed ICU regex is the way to go, however,
I just read
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, BRM bm_witn...@yahoo.com wrote:
...
So, when we import the Kenai SVN into the Apache
SVN then commit history
is not important as we will loose data from
February until today.
At least, that's my opinion.
FWIW - there is a project cvs2svn that can
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
...
So, all is not necessarily lost - but it does depend
on whether you want to reload the SVN repo.
I don't know how you thought about CVS but the respective
repo is already on SVN.
I am confused. Apparently (I am a
Hi Eike;
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
...
Hi Pedro,
On Monday, 2011-07-18 07:57:02 -0700, Pedro F. Giffuni
wrote:
(1) boost/Regex_Experimental.tar.gz
Should be unpacked and committed or removed.
I know we basically agreed ICU regex is the way to go
Hello Mathias;
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
Hi,
I tried to get rid of some copyleft dependencies. As I will
leave for vacation on Wednesday,
First of all, thanks so much for working on this!
I now send my first patch to the list so that others already
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
...
I would like to add a couple more:
1) xpdf (GPL'd) is a run dependency, this is
linux/unix specific. PDFBox may be a replacement.
This component is used for the pdf import extension, not
for OOo itself.
The
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Christian Lohmaier cl...@openoffice.org wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni giffu...@tutopia.com
wrote:
1) xpdf (GPL'd) is a run dependency, this is
linux/unix specific. PDFBox may be a replacement.
Why would this be linux/unix specific? xpdf
--- On Mon, 7/18/11, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
...
BTW - I have a TODO on
http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/website-local.html
for how to create a patch.
OK, I have a question about this -- how to create a patch.
Is it really just as simple as running a diff on the
FWIW;
When merging the branches most of the CWS information will be
lost anyways .. won't it? I have seen other projects using
subversion that take a snapshot and eventually update stuff
from trunk, but when the project is finished and merged back
the branch history is not viewable from the
Hi Eike;
FWIW, building ICU 4.8 on FreeBSD required a patch for the
memory issue I reported in an older thread. This kind of
fixes are better handled by distributions .. and certain
OO forks already do this.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 7/20/11, Eike Rathke o...@erack.de wrote:
...
Hi Javier,
FWIW,
System libraries are covered by exceptions to the GPL
and even the FSF have written in a FAQ that those don't
taint anything in userland.
This does remind me that it's really desirable to be
able to build OO with clang: not exactly due to the
licensing but for cleanliness and portability.
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, Malte Timmermann malte.timmerm...@gmx.com wrote:
Wrt PDF Import Extension, and similar extensions: Optional
extensions should not be part of a regular OOo build or
source tree,
IMHO.
In general, I agree, however a pdf import extension (with OCR)
would be popular
there might be special cases, but we will have to wait
until we have a first build to look at that.
cheers,
Pedro.
Malte.
On 22.07.2011 17:11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Fri, 7/22/11, Malte Timmermannmalte.timmerm...@gmx.com
wrote:
Wrt PDF Import Extension, and similar
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
[1] Note that with the map, it would also be possible to
reuse the old OOo-Subversion repo for the linear commits,
after all the hg repo was a conversion from the svn server.
This would save quite a bit of time.
I like this idea ... if
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Jens-Heiner Rechtien wrote:
On 07/28/2011 04:32 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
[1] Note that with the map, it would also be
possible to reuse the old OOo-Subversion repo
for the linear commits, after all the hg
--- On Fri, 7/29/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
So let me use a analogy to illustrate why I though that was
a sarcasm:
to me, Rob's paragraph read as:
The offer remain open: If any gay person want to marry, we
will gladly recognize that marriage, as long as they
--- On Fri, 7/29/11, Norbert Thiebaud nthieb...@gmail.com wrote:
...
ok let me use a concrete example:
Let say person A found somewhere in the code something
like
printf( s_usingText );
where there is a risk that s_usingText is not sanitized...
let's say person A notify this
--- On Sun, 7/31/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
SNIP
...
INFRASTRUCTURE RESTRAINTS?
However we do this, there is an infrastructure hit,
whether supported on a third-party service (requiring fees)
or on the Apache.org infrastructure but with the
OpenOffice.org domain and
--- On Mon, 8/1/11, Rob Weir wrote:
So where are we with this? The last I heard, the
proposal was to store an archival version of the
Hg repositories at apache-extras [1] and then to
check the tip into SVN.
I am pretty sure there was no objection to having
a backup in apache extras. The
Hi;
--- On Wed, 8/3/11, Mathias Bauer wrote:
...
As Stephan wrote, the structure can be changed easily
afterwards.
Building and packaging should follow dependencies (after
all that was the idea of our new build environment) and
so the directory structure is of second order importance.
Hello Fabien;
We are still currently doing the transition from Oracle (Hg)
to Apache (SVN), and that is taking a long time because the
process requires some care. For the time being you can only
get the OpenOffice.org sources from Oracle as always.
Entually the code will get here:
Hi Eric;
I agree OOo4Kids and OOolight deserve a space in the forums,
I was not aware about them but they are very interesting and
it's the kind of things we really want to see stronger with
an Apache Project.
Something to think about is if they deserve a special forum
for themselves. You know
Hi;
I appreciate the tough work that is being done to transfer
the Wiki, forums, etc ... but I would've thought the greatest
priority was the SVN repository.
Any reassuring comment on this? Something like we are
working on this but the script will still require a month to
complete the conversion
--- On Wed, 8/10/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
...
Let me try to recap the consensus so far. I was on
vaction for two
weeks, so I was not involved in all discussions.
A full conversion hg - svn for the trunk
repo and all cws is considered
to be impossible, so all
,
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 8/2/11, Christian Lohmaier cl...@openoffice.org wrote:
...
Hi Heiner, *,
On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Jens-Heiner Rechtien
jhrecht...@web.de
wrote:
On 07/28/2011 04:32 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Thu, 7/28/11, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
[1] Note
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
We've been discussing for two months
now how to get Hg over to SVN.
There have been several suggestions for how the CWS's and
complete revision history could be migrated over, but
little progress has been made. Either the
Hi again;
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
The migration to Apache-Extras is the easy part,
right? It is just Hg to Hg. So we maintain the
complete revision history that way.
Iff apache-extras offers sufficient space for the
repository.
Actually, I am not very
--- On Mon, 8/15/11, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
I look at it this way: What do we need to do to
unblock the greatest number of people on the
project? Getting the wiki migrated enables many
contributors. Getting SVN working does the same.
Bugzilla is mainly useful once we are
Hi again;
- Original Message -
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Rob Weir apa...@robweir.com wrote:
...
We're only checking in the tip of the trunk into SVN. The history is
going to Apache-Extras, and remaining in Hg. I don't see how you
would use the history to verify a SVN
Hi;
--- On Sun, 8/21/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Soon, I hope, the OOo code will be checked into SVN.
After that happens I think we need to coordinate on
the next steps. I know that several of us have code
they'd like to check-in, CWS's to integrate, LGPL code
to remove, etc.
Thanks Mark and everybody else involved!
I do prefer this approach than the stepped transition
that was planned previously. Here we know what we got
and people don't have to spend time finishing the
migration in the background.
It does look sane: attachments are still there, which
is the main
FWIW, the code is there since yesterday :) ... Anyone wants the honor of
commiting the missing files?
Cheers,
Pedro.
Hi Dennis;
Hmm... no need to copy everyone that should already
subscribed to the list :-)
Perhaps just put up a note on the blog that the code is finally in?
Eike did the commit of the missing files so things are being worked
on but for now we need to be careful not to break things. Mathias'
--- On Sun, 8/28/11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
...
trademarks in your book or article.
http://apache.org/foundation/marks/
Nobody has to ask to use the term Apache OpenOffice.org.
But it is preferred that the booktitile is Apache
OpenOffice.org 3.3 für Ein-und Umsteiger.
Actually, I
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Rob Weir r...@robweir.com wrote:
...
For the production instance, are we preserving the
original login/passwords, or will they also be all
set to password?
I understand, from the comment in JIRA, that people
will have to reset them from their email accounts.
Pedro.
Looking a bit into Matthias' list, there's the saxon issue.
I looked for a replacement and it would look like the
Apache Xalan project could be an alternative:
http://xalan.apache.org/
If, for some reason, we want to keep saxon, please note:
- In principle it would seem like it's required
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
...
On Linux it always was needed in OOo, either from system or
- in case
BUILD_EPM=YES - from the ooo module epm. If you want to do
it differently, send patches. :-)
If I ever work on the build system, it will be very
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Michael Stahl wrote:
...
With the cleanup of this license headers we can try to
remove the code in one place and reuse it.
LCC is not copyleft and in our particular use it may be
OK, but some provisions could be problematic:
lexer.
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Mon, 8/29/11, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
...
This is an important question. If we need another
preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now
why.
cheers,
Pedro.
(1) http://mcpp.sourceforge.net/
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
...
This is an important question. If we need another
preprocessor there are options(1), but we need to now
why.
At least for idlc, I think the best solution would be to
get rid of a C preprocessor completely. Even if
de-facto (if not
--- On Tue, 8/30/11, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
...
(I don't know who wrote this ... )
I'd like to see commit log/messages containing the
number of fixed issue referenced and no commit
messages without that number.
So people would not be allowed to improve things without
first
I think it works fine, perhaps Ray got confused with the infra JIRA, which, of
course, manages the infrastructure for all projects.
Not that it matters too much, but ... Do we have a bugzilla template expert? It
would be good if we could make it look like the previous one. Perhaps we
can even
While here,
Can Apache projects rely on Mozilla's nss (MPL)?
I looked for alternatives but I only found the java based
Bouncy Castle:
http://www.bouncycastle.org/
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Thu, 9/1/11, Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
From: Dennis E. Hamilton
Hi;
I went through the early LibreOffice archives
checking which issues from our database they
considered for inclusion.
I have to say it was a GREAT idea to start
from the tip of the Hg development tree as
most fixes already appear closed (applied
or integrated to a CWS).
The following 24 open
--- On Fri, 9/2/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Is it worth contacting the authors of these dictionaries to
see if they would consider giving it a license we can use?
My standard boilerplate reply was:
Please note that we will not receive contributions under
copyleft licenses
Hi Dale;
With due respect to Italy's cultural richness (which I so
much admire being italian myself but not only because of that),
Neapolitan is classified as a dialect, not a language, for
good reasons.
Compared to standard italian you use the same character set
and gramatical rules.
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
--- On Fri, 9/2/11, Rob Weirrobw...@apache.org
wrote:
Is it worth contacting the authors of these dictionaries to
see if they would consider giving it a license we can use?
Simply +1.
No need to vote.. just do it (TM).
to OpenOffice that would now see that
their are efforts better appreciated elsewhere.
It's just 24 bugs with patches: we can do them all
before the next release (likely to happen next year).
cheers,
Pedro.
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 09/03/2011 04:39 AM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni:
Hi
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
...
On Sat, Sep 3, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Hi Marcus;
The exact flag in bugzilla is 3.4_release_blocker.
Not including *ALL* these 24 bugs for the next
release
would be like saying to our contributors that we
Pescetti pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
Neapolitan is classified as a dialect, not a language,
for
good reasons.
It's in ISO 639-2 so it's a language, and it's distinct
from Italian. Among the local languages spoken in Italy, we
already fully support the four
Hi;
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Dale Erwin d...@casaerwin.org wrote:
...
Spoken like a true northern Italian bigot... with all due
respect.
Please note I did not call you a northern Italian bigot...
I said you speak like one. Maybe you are just
misinformed.
I should've thought better before
--- On Sat, 9/3/11, Raphael Bircher r.birc...@gmx.ch wrote:
...
Only because a patch it's included in LibO we should not
include it automaticly here. There are many reasons to not
include a pach.
- Lisence Problems
- The Patch is not compatible with other Operating system.
- The patch is
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
...
Example 1:
- A posting in LO mailinglist from Sept 2010 says:
Creating a 'bug' saw no action in 3 years
Here is hoping that posting the patch to this
new project will :-)
(There goes one developer that will probably
--- On Sun, 9/4/11, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
...
As addition:
It's also about code quality and stability.
I have never said the contrary.
Currently we have already a (relative) stable code with the
released OOo 3.4 Beta. So, it would be IMHO not clever to
through in all the new code from
Ahh.. found it!
The problem is solved in section 5 of the
Apache License:
___
5. Submission of Contributions.
Unless You explicitly state otherwise, any Contribution intentionally submitted
for inclusion in the Work by You to the Licensor shall be under the terms and
conditions of this
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
...
We have established that relicensing the existing OOo user
guides (which are licensed CC-BY) to the Apache license
is not practical.
Does this mean, as Rob has suggested, that these guides
*cannot* be part of the official
Hi Jean;
Continuing on the topic of my general ignorance ...
--- On Mon, 9/5/11, Jean Weber jeanwe...@gmail.com wrote:
...
It's not clear to me that the user guides produced by
ODFAuthors are in fact official documentation even
though they are made available as ODT and PDF through
the OOo
Hmm ...
It looks like I missed where the decision to use MediaWiki and deprecate
confluence
was taken. I guess it was arranged with infra as long as MW is up to date and
the extensions are documented.
I am not complaining though: it sounds like lazy consensus in action plus we can
always change
Hello Eike;
From what I discussed with Rob there is no objection
on his side wrt to integrating the CWS'.
I was waiting for the FreeBSD port to go through before
pushing this further, but in general the idea here is
that lazy consensus applies: no one objected so the
issue is left for those that
the
DNS
entries? In my mind, if there is already a lot of
content on the MW and
the
Apache Foundation allows us to continue to use
it, why not?
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Pedro F.
Giffuni giffu
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
So I don't think we can give an answer set in stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear enough.
Pedro.
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org
wrote:
So I don't think we can give an answer set in
stone.
Again, section 5 of the Apache License is clear
enough
I made a call for this before but maybe it was lost:
Do we have a bugzilla UI expert here?
I have just learned that indeed the templates for
the older bugzilla are available.
cheers,
Pedro.
Hello;
--- On Tue, 9/6/11, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Pedro has already gone over to check
with Infrastructure about doing a test.
...
Regards,
Dave
Yes, here is the post I sent to the infrastructure guys.
I guess they have the MW data and the confluence know-how
but it
(This just required a new subject header)
Hi;
As you know the bugzilla database is working already (very
well to be honest) but the UI interface changes were not
brought in due to the extremely outdated version (3.2.10)
the old site was running.
Apparently it is not a difficult task and it
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 06/09/11 05:34, Jean Weber a écrit :
Hi Jean, all,
I am afraid we must still do this. Perhaps it's
easier to find the people that oppose ..
Can we legally make a call to everyone that
opposes the change to speak up before
a
to it.
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
(This just required a new subject header)
Hi;
As you know the bugzilla database is working already
(very
well to be honest) but the UI interface changes were
not
brought in due to the extremely outdated version
(3.2.10
FWIW,
The external sources include a lot of stuff that is
outdated and there may even be security risks involved.
I think I posted a list of outdated stuff before and
on FreeBSD I made sure we carry natively the latest
versions (with some care for compatibility).
Also there's the issue that was
.
Pedro.
--- On Wed, 9/7/11, Reizinger Zoltán zreizin...@hdsnet.hu wrote:
2011.09.07. 18:10 keltezéssel, Pedro F. Giffuni írta:
Great! Thanks to Matt!!
One thing I didn't mention and that may be
interesting for international users is that
the new bugzilla can
be customized for other
1 - 100 of 157 matches
Mail list logo
