Re: [Oorexx-devel] A simple benchmark result of the new GC code.

2018-08-25 Thread Rick McGuire
I tried a similar experiment on Windows 10, same result. Each GC cycle took longer because of the larger numbers of large objects in the array, but it eventually completed. Rick On Sat, Aug 25, 2018 at 7:08 PM Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel < oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A simple benchmark result of the new GC code.

2018-08-25 Thread Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel
> I notice that below code now just ends without any indication on Windows and > will get automatically killed on Ubuntu after about 7 mio iterations (this is > on 64-bit builds on some specific machines; you might need to tweak n > depending on your system/memory configuration). > … … ...

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A simple benchmark result of the new GC code.

2018-08-25 Thread Rick McGuire
It runs all the way to completion for me on Windows (64-bit) without an error. Could it be possible that Ubuntu is killing it because it is hitting some per-process memory limit rather than returning a NULL for the memory failure. This program really should have been much affected by the new code