Re: [Oorexx-devel] recent MacOS 10.15.2 and Xcode 'misses stdlib.h' build error

> z/OS can run 24, 31 and 64 bit code alongside and call each other Indeed... upwards compatibility is always valuable. I quite often get requests to add enhancements to tools that I wrote pre-REX (i.e, late 1970s). These are still running and in daily use. (I just send the requesters the sou

Re: [Oorexx-devel] recent MacOS 10.15.2 and Xcode 'misses stdlib.h' build error

Hi P.O., I understand your points. I have always been ‘bleeding edge’ and I mostly enjoy solving the problems. I agree that Apple make a lot of trouble for us but I always have a linux machine which is one 'git pull' away from me being able to continue whatever I am working on. Personally, I u

Re: [Oorexx-devel] recent MacOS 10.15.2 and Xcode 'misses stdlib.h' build error

Hi René, I have a new computer running Catalina as well (not updated but clean built). I noticed the problems but did not get around to inform you all. Sorry. Re "I keep my MacBook always on the latest OS“ This is no longer a good strategy with MacOS; you have to wait at least to the first upd

[Oorexx-devel] recent MacOS 10.15.2 and Xcode 'misses stdlib.h' build error

I keep my MacBook always on the latest OS and Xcode levels, and suddenly, with MacOS Catalina 10.15.2 and the latest XCode the ooRexx build missed stdlib.h I googled stackoverflow a bit and encountered a lot of solutions that did not work. I will not withhold the one that did work from you: su

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Old Process for Building the ooRexx Documentation (Publican)

On 01.02.2020 19:49, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > I agree that color coding the examples would be nice but I believe that is a > "feature" of DocBook > that may require a different transform program. This link > describes how to > do someth

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Old Process for Building the ooRexx Documentation (Publican)

On 01.02.2020 20:46, Jean Louis Faucher wrote: > The notes and tools in my GitHub repository are for the old format of > documentation, before the > work made by David to switch to Publican. > Nothing you can reuse for the current version. :( Maybe, once the new process of creating the documenta

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Old Process for Building the ooRexx Documentation (Publican)

Hi Gil, On 01.02.2020 19:49, Gil Barmwater wrote: > In looking at the documentation files on SF, I saw a number of .css files > which I assumed were > needed/used by the HTML build process. Perhaps all they need is some tweaking > to fix the problems > P.O. is seeing? That would be great! > > I