Am 10.04.2024 um 17:09 schrieb Chip Davis :
Have to admit, Rony's "out-arrows" do make a much more
immediately-visible eyecatcher. Would that be appropriate for
"Signal" as well, since it (may) violate the routine nesting
structure?The invocation tracelinr (>I>} gets
Have to admit, Rony's "out-arrows" do make a much more
immediately-visible eyecatcher. Would that be appropriate for
"Signal" as well, since it (may) violate the routine nesting structure?
-Chip-
On 4/10/2024 7:40 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Here an example program that uses a routine and
Here an example program that uses a routine and methods (and internal routines) for getting an
impression on the trace output:
say "hi" o=.test~new say "o~hi :" o~hi say "o~ho :" o~ho say "pp(abc):"
pp(abc) ::routine pp
res=br(arg(1)) return res br: return "[" || arg(1) || "]" ::class tes
Missatge de Gilbert Barmwater del dia dt., 9 d’abr.
2024 a les 18:02:
> I would suggest that for cases where you wish to see the exit from a
> routine or method that you add a label - perhaps end: - as the last line of
> the routine or method.
>
Rony's proposal still has merit because, in some ca
