Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.

2014-06-13 Thread Rick McGuire
Ok, great. I'm fine with not adding these to the older versions. I'm starting to question whether we should even support those older systems for new-feature releases. I'm fine with including them if we do a bug fix release (e.g., a 4.2.1), but that will be a version based off of the old builds a

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.

2014-06-13 Thread David Ashley
Nope. The file manifest is actually in the rpm spec file and the deb manifest file. The magic happens there. David Ashley On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 05:36 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote: > Ok, my biggest concern is that two of the samples will be picked up > because they are .rex files, but will be non-fun

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.

2014-06-13 Thread Rick McGuire
Ok, my biggest concern is that two of the samples will be picked up because they are .rex files, but will be non-functional because they pick up files they depend upon. Rick On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:07 PM, David Ashley wrote: > Rick - > > I have to be perfectly honest here. I do not see these

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.

2014-06-12 Thread David Ashley
Rick - I have to be perfectly honest here. I do not see these updates as necessary to the old build. As long as the code is up-to-date, I am not fired up to make the to builds match entirely. Especially since the old builds will be targeted mostly toward older distributions that will be going out

[Oorexx-devel] Fixing up Makefile.am for new samples.

2014-06-12 Thread Rick McGuire
David, Could you take a look at what needs to be done in Makefile.am for the changes to the samples? If I read what it's doing correctly, it is just copying all of the .rex files. However, there are now a couple other files in that directory (a .cls and a .txt) that would also need to be copied.