On 14.03.2021 12:08, Rick McGuire wrote:
> It really is a security feature. Things start getting terribly wonky if the
> behavior of a class
> gets altered beyond the author's intentions.
This may be the case, but the same (a very general) argument would work against
almost anything
where the
> It really is a security feature.
> Things start getting terribly wonky if the behavior of a class gets
altered beyond the author's intentions.
What about allowing just something most basic, like *adding *new methods
only (no deletions or modifications of existing)?
It really is a security feature. Things start getting terribly wonky if the
behavior of a class gets altered beyond the author's intentions.
Rick
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 6:44 AM Erich Steinböck
wrote:
> For an elegant solution I so often wish I could add a method to a class
> within the REXX
For an elegant solution I so often wish I could add a method to a class
within the REXX package, but can't, as it's forbidden. I think it's also
impossible to add a method to an existing instance of such a class (an
instance like e. g. a DateTime that is returned from a .File method).
What is
