Re: [Oorexx-devel] Portability

2017-04-23 Thread CVBruce
Sounds reasonable to me. Anybody else? > On Apr 23, 2017, at 8:14 AM, Erich Steinböck > wrote: > > For any (even unformatted ASCII, or such) Compatibility Chapter text I > receive, I'd be willing to format and add it to rexxref or rexxpg as > appropriate. > >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Portability

2017-04-23 Thread Erich Steinböck
For any (even unformatted ASCII, or such) Compatibility Chapter text I receive, I'd be willing to format and add it to rexxref or rexxpg as appropriate. (doc patches, of course, are welcome, too) On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 4:54 PM, CVBruce wrote: > Hi, > > Another portability

[Oorexx-devel] Portability

2017-04-23 Thread CVBruce
Hi, Another portability issue has popped up. I would like to suggest that we provide portability documentation. This could be either a separate document, or it could be an appendix or chapter in the ooRexx Reference or other manual. I would see three kinds of portability information being