Hello Erich,
I now have a testGroup for SysTempFileName, I could do 9 tests, 54 assertions
that I could think ok. Tested on macOS, Win 10 and some 6 different Linux
dialects.
However while modifying the text for this section in rexxref it just occurred
to me that I had not tested with MORE
Hi P.O.,
yes, SysTempFileName is expected to now work identically on all platforms.
Providing a test case would be great
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Dear Gil,
I guess running it on all platforms once does not qualify for a test :-). I´ll
leave it to someone with more insight to do it then, or are you telling me I
should write a test case for it? I can do that.
Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se
> Am 22.03.2020 um
P.O.,
See RFE #745; the last comment says that the tests and doc updates are
still to be done.
Gil
On 3/22/2020 11:18 AM, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
Dear developers,
SysTempFileName now works differently (read: better) compared to
ooRexx 4 for Linux/macOS and I wanted to amend the documentation
Dear developers,
SysTempFileName now works differently (read: better) compared to ooRexx 4 for
Linux/macOS and I wanted to amend the documentation accordingly.
From what I can see from using SysTempFileName() it behaves exactly the same
for all platforms, Is this correctly understood, or is
