On Fri, 6 Jan 2023 at 10:53, Erich Steinböck
wrote:
> Our docs state "Open Object Rexx™ and ooRexx™ are trademarks of the Rexx
> Language Association".
>
> I've searched several online Trademark Portals (e. g. TESS at
> https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=4810:74iqlo.1.1)
> a
Trademark does not protect ownership as such, it protects the NAME of
the product from
being spoofed by someone as their own.
Leslie
On 2023-01-06 10:19:57 René Jansen wrote:
> Hi Erich,
>
> IBM has stated to have transferred the trademarks to The Rexx Language
> Association. I have hea
“Open Object Rexx as legal successor and derivative work of Object Rexx”
Having said that, I would like to flag this as a contentious subject, because
solving this, IMHO, does not serve any useful purpose. Also, we have several
jurisdictions, with you being in Austria, RexxLA being in North Caro
Hi René,
persons employed by IBM at the time, and in charge of Object Rexx
>
but then would IBM trademarks not have been for maybe "oRexx or "Object
Rexx", but not "ooRexx" or "Open Object Rexx"?
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourcefor
Hi Erich,
IBM has stated to have transferred the trademarks to The Rexx Language
Association. I have heard this statement in person from at least two different
persons employed by IBM at the time, and in charge of Object Rexx. The document
signed between RexxLA and IBM has (project phase II) “T
Our docs state "Open Object Rexx™ and ooRexx™ are trademarks of the Rexx
Language Association".
I've searched several online Trademark Portals (e. g. TESS at
https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?f=searchss&state=4810:74iqlo.1.1)
and cannot verify whether this is actually true.
Is "Open Object
