Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, at 18:26, tango foxtrot wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > On my browser I can use C-numpad+ and C-numpad- to increase and decrease > the size of displayed text and image.  Would this be a satisfactory > replacement for the font-specific JS? It's interesting that - for a while - many

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

The larger version looks much better to me as well. Rick On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 1:16 PM Gil Barmwater wrote: > OK, I believe I have it right this time! Here is the original, smaller > > version as well as the newer, larger >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

Dear Gil, On a MAC + and - will change the size of any text in any browser. I have compared on a medium-res screen (1920X1080, 81 PPI) and a high-res retina screen (2560X1600, 227 PPI) and on both systems the larger font is more pleasing. I vote for the larger text as well. Given the average

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

Whew! Glad I got it right this time :-). As for your questions, I'll defer to those who actually might know the answers but on Windows, the IE and Edge browsers allow for "scaling" (not sure that this is the right term) the display. In my case, I almost always have it set 125%, making the displ

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

Hi Jeremy, On my browser I can use C-numpad+ and C-numpad- to increase and decrease the size of displayed text and image.  Would this be a satisfactory replacement for the font-specific JS? On 2020-03-10 11:11, Jeremy Nicoll wrote: On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, at 17:15, Gil Barmwater wrote: OK, I b

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

On Tue, 10 Mar 2020, at 17:15, Gil Barmwater wrote: > OK, I believe I have it right this time! Here is the original, smaller > > version as well as the newer, larger >

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

OK, I believe I have it right this time! Here is the original, smaller version as well as the newer, larger version. All comments are appreciated. Gil On 3/

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

Sorry, my bad! Didn't check that I got the right set of files uploaded. Will make another try later. Stay tuned... GB On 3/9/2020 9:09 PM, Jeremy Nicoll wrote: On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, at 21:34, Rick McGuire wrote: With the exception of the license information, both versions look the same to me. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

On Mon, 9 Mar 2020, at 21:34, Rick McGuire wrote: > With the exception of the license information, both versions look the > same to me. I don't see any differences anywhere. The css files in both file sets are identical. -- Jeremy Nicoll - my opinions are my own.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

With the exception of the license information, both versions look the same to me. Rick On Mon, Mar 9, 2020 at 5:18 PM Gil Barmwater wrote: > It has been suggested that the font-size used for the body of the HTML > files is a bit too small. I have created a version of the rxmath book with > a sl

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

I will channel our dearly departed Les Koehler and suggest that, given the average age of the Rexx-programming cohort, a larger font may be better.  :-) -Chip- On 3/9/2020 4:56 PM, Gil Barmwater wrote: It has been suggested that the font-size used for the body of the HTML files is a bit too

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

It has been suggested that the font-size used for the body of the HTML files is a bit too small. I have created a version of the rxmath book with a slightly larger font-size and I would like some feedback on your preference - the original, smaller

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

On 08.03.2020 21:51, Gil Barmwater wrote: > > Newest version of rxmath HTML files/folders is here > . I believe I've > gotten the majority of > the issues handled so please have another look. > Gil, I think you have solved the image proble

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Another successful run on creating the rxmath.html documentation!

Newest version of rxmath HTML files/folders is here . I believe I've gotten the majority of the issues handled so please have another look. Thanks, Gil On 3/8/2020 11:52 AM, Gil Barmwater wrote: Hi P.O., Thanks for doing the detaile