[Oorexx-devel] A few questions in the context of RexxCreateInterpreter, LIbraries and co-existence with the classic functions ...

2009-05-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
While working on moving BSF4Rexx to the 4.0 APIs and at the same time keeping it backwardly compatible with Rexx scripts using it, I have been running into problems for which the cause is not clear to me (and debugging doesn't really help as the JVM takes over the debugging and I cannot get into

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A few questions in the context of RexxCreateInterpreter, LIbraries and co-existence with the classic functions ...

2009-05-04 Thread Rick McGuire
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: While working on moving BSF4Rexx to the 4.0 APIs and at the same time keeping it backwardly compatible with Rexx scripts using it, I have been running into problems for which the cause is not clear to me (and

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A few questions in the context of RexxCreateInterpreter, LIbraries and co-existence with the classic functions ...

2009-05-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Rick McGuire wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: While working on moving BSF4Rexx to the 4.0 APIs and at the same time keeping it backwardly compatible with Rexx scripts using it, I have been running into problems for which the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] A few questions in the context of RexxCreateInterpreter, LIbraries and co-existence with the classic functions ...

2009-05-04 Thread Rick McGuire
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 12:12 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: Rick McGuire wrote: On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: While working on moving BSF4Rexx to the 4.0 APIs and at the same time keeping it backwardly

[Oorexx-devel] How to add a new bug at Sourceforge ?

2009-05-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi there, probably a little bit overworked, combined with a new layout: how, for God's sake, does one add a new bug at https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=684730group_id=119701func=browse? I would like to submit the RexxCreateInterpreter() crash before going to bed, but am stumped at not being

[Oorexx-devel] Bug: Crash RexxCreateInstance() ...

2009-05-04 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Short of being able to file a new bug in the SF tracker, I uploaded the zip-archive http://wi.wu-wien.ac.at/rgf/rexx/misc/bugs/CrashRexxCreateInterpreter%2d20090504rgf%2ezip with a nutshell version and the readme.txt http://wi.wu-wien.ac.at/rgf/rexx/misc/bugs/readme.txt describing how to re-create

Re: [Oorexx-devel] How to add a new bug at Sourceforge ?

2009-05-04 Thread Rick McGuire
Sourceforge appears to have rolled out the new look and feel todayand it appears to be having some problems! I don't see any way to open new items either. Rick On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:27 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote: Hi there, probably a little bit

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Bug: Crash RexxCreateInstance() ...

2009-05-04 Thread Rick McGuire
Rony, Please include compiled dlls with this. I don't have the appropriate Java SDK to installed on my machine to compile this. I need at least the CRASH1 version. The CRASH2 problem is most likely the caused by the bad OOREXX_GET_PACKAGE(test); // package loader stub which

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Installing from source

2009-05-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 5:42 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote: Okay, I got the correct source tar file and tested building from it. (Which works with just ./configure make) Alright, now I have it uploaded to SourceForge. The file name is the same, but if you look at the date you

[Oorexx-devel] Trivial (?) difference in stream() behavior

2009-05-04 Thread Mark Miesfeld
Rick, This test: self~expectSyntax(40.0) ret = stream(fileName, 'C', open read append) self~assertSame(READY:, ret) passes under 3.2.0 but fails in 4.0.0 because 4.0.0 raises 93.0 instead of 40.0 for the error. I'm not sure if that needs to be fixed or not. Right now I have the test in the