Still careful & still enjoying (classic!!!) Rexx
Walter
- Original Message -
From: "Rick McGuire"
To: "Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List"
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Just curious about "missing" exit numbers ...
Oops, mistyped. 6 was th
Oops, mistyped. 6 was the memory exit.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Walter Pachl wrote:
> He asked for 6.
> Greetings from icy Vienna
> Walter
> - Original Message -
> From: "Rick McGuire"
> To: "Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List"
>
> Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 8:06 PM
He asked for 6.
Greetings from icy Vienna
Walter
- Original Message -
From: "Rick McGuire"
To: "Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List"
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Just curious about "missing" exit numbers ...
> On the mainframes, 5 was used
On the mainframes, 5 was used for a memory exit that was never
implemented for non-mainframe environments. Not sure why 1 was
skipped.
Rick
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> While going through the exit numbers as defined in "rexxapidefs.h" of ooRexx
> as constants in
While going through the exit numbers as defined in "rexxapidefs.h" of ooRexx as
constants in the
section "System Exit function and sub-function definitions" it is interesting
to note, that the
numbers 1 and 6 are not used for any exits. Just curious why this is the case?
TIA,
---rony
--
