David,
Your inheritance table experiment broke the doc build. I'm not completely
certain of the error, but I suspect the tgroup tag needs to surround
everything rather than being just a standalone tag.
Rick
--
Rapidly
Maintaining both trunk and 4.2.0 branches of the docs are starting to
become a bit of a pain given the number of updates. David only updated the
4.2.0 branch for his inheritance table work, so they are already out of
sync. I propose that for now, we only update the 4.2.0 branch, and then
copy
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 4:38 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Maintaining both trunk and 4.2.0 branches of the docs are starting to
become a bit of a pain given the number of updates. David only updated the
4.2.0 branch for his inheritance table work, so they are already out of
yeah, we can do the back copy on a doc-by-doc basis when the time comes.
I'm ok with that. I might even try doing a merge first rather than a
replacement to maintain the update histories.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at
Okay, I'm good with that.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 6:57 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
yeah, we can do the back copy on a doc-by-doc basis when the time comes.
I'm ok with that. I might even try doing a merge first rather than a
replacement to maintain the
All -
I have not committed the changes yet but I have what I think will work
for replacing the class diagrams with tables. While not an exact
replacement it seems to work pretty well and looks better than I
expected.
Before I commit I want an opinion. Should I delete the diagram files as
I go or
I'd say whatever you find easier, since you're doing the work. SVN allows
us to recover anything you might delete accidentally and we also have back
up in the trunk branch.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:39 PM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.comwrote:
All -
I have not committed the
Yes, whatever is easiest for you David.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd say whatever you find easier, since you're doing the work. SVN allows
us to recover anything you might delete accidentally and we also have back
up in the
The other day I was enthusing about the advantages of ooRexx to a chap who
was well-versed in computer languages.
The next time we spoke, he said,
Well, I downloaded ooRexx and nothing happened. No icon on the desktop, no
nothing. Waste of time imho.
I did try to convince him to look at Try
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Oliver Sims
oliver.s...@simsassociates.co.uk wrote:
The other day I was enthusing about the advantages of ooRexx to a chap
who was well-versed in computer languages.
I'm not at all trying to discourage you from coming up with a better intro,
but this sort of
Applications that unilaterally add an icon to my Desktop drive me nuts.
It's my desktop, damn it, I only what stuff on there that I determine are
useful enough to be handy.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 9:50 AM, Oliver
I'm with Oliver on this one ...
Applications that unilaterally add an icon to my Desktop drive me nuts. It's my
desktop, damn it, I only what stuff on there that I determine are useful enough
to be handy.
Agree in principle, but also applications that offer one the option of adding an
icon
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.comwrote:
Applications that unilaterally add an icon to my Desktop drive me nuts.
It's my desktop, damn it, I only what stuff on there that I determine are
useful enough to be handy.
The installer would have a check box to
May I suggest that when installation is finnished, bring up the ooRexx ref
guide (hopefully pdf reader is installed) or the readMe pdf, for those that
doesn't bother to look for what was installed.
Maybe a new installation option instead 'tickbox - I want to know what to do
after install'
I'm happy with an icon on the desktop .. I can easily delete it, or (more
usually) move it to a folder on my desktop where I'll be able to find it easily
again.
That's good, as I first said, I'm not saying we shouldn't add a desktop icon.
But, I'm still not sure what the icon should point to?
On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com wrote:
But think 'out of the box' for a minute. The icon does not have to start
a program. It could take one to the ooRexx website, for example, Or to a
tutorial. Or to a collection of useful classes and programs. Or
How about creating a link on the desktop that links to the ooRexx menu folder?
Opening it depicts all the ooRexx menu entries including the documentation
subfolder and the like. One could add links to Internet resources as Mike
suggested and more. If the user does not want that folder link on
I finished replacing the class diagrams in collclasses.xml. Rexxref now
builds correctly. A new rexxref will be ready in the morning.
Please let me know if the new table format is acceptable.
David Ashley
--
Rapidly
That makes very good sense ...
How about creating a link on the desktop that links to the ooRexx menu folder?
Opening it depicts all the ooRexx menu entries including the documentation
subfolder and the like. One could add links to Internet resources as Mike
suggested and more. If the user does
19 matches
Mail list logo
