Re: [Oorexx-devel] IPv6 rxsock Function Library

2014-02-10 Thread Rick McGuire
To me, it sounds like option 4 of using IPV4 mapped to IPV6 is the cleanest way to implement this. I'm wondering if we might want to take the approach used with oodialog and separate the rxsock library from the interpreter release. The Windows installer could then check the prereqs to ensure it

Re: [Oorexx-devel] IPv6 rxsock Function Library

2014-02-10 Thread David Ashley
While I like option 4 there are some things that need to be checked out. For instance, will this option work when there is no set up for IPv6 on the adapter? So far I have not been able to determine that from anything I have read. I am sure there are some other things to check out as well. As to

Re: [Oorexx-devel] IPv6 rxsock Function Library

2014-02-10 Thread Michael Lueck
David Ashley wrote: 1. As always, the Windows implementation of IPv6 will cause us some pain. We really need to use the latest version of .Net IPv6 within Windows does not have a native C/C++ interface, only .Net? Blessings, -- Michael Lueck Lueck Data Systems