Re: [Oorexx-devel] Current rail-diagrams in ooRexx 5.0 docs wrong

We all can agree that the existing ASCII-art rail diagrams are unacceptable, from both an esthetic and information-transfer standpoint. We must adopt an alternative. While Jean-Louis' renderings are much better, they suffer from the visual clutter of unnecessary arrowheads. The flow through a

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Current rail-diagrams in ooRexx 5.0 docs wrong

Ahem, sorry, forgot the URL: . ---rony On 15.06.2015 13:34, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Maybe Jean-Louis Faucher can chime in and explain how he did the syntactical > correct svg diagrams. > > Also, there was a student of mine who worked on EBNF to allow Op

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Current rail-diagrams in ooRexx 5.0 docs wrong

Maybe Jean-Louis Faucher can chime in and explain how he did the syntactical correct svg diagrams. Also, there was a student of mine who worked on EBNF to allow OpenOffice to be used as an "editor" which was able to render the EBNF to ASCII syntax-diagrams (the current style, but with glyphs th

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Current rail-diagrams in ooRexx 5.0 docs wrong

> > However, the syntax diagrams for default values are still incorrect in > rexxref5.pdf; they should appear on a branch Above the main line, not on > the main line itself: > When David changed from the ASCII to the SVG diagrams, he chose bottlecaps.de/rr. This raiload generator doesn't support a