I have several thoughts on this:
1) we cannot just drop support for something that has been in there for such a
long time
2) if we open this up, I really want to include the change for non-admin
operation of rxapi in the 5.00 release
So my vote is to have a good look at this, and not to decide
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:34 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> Should I file a bug for this, such that this can be resolved for ooRexx
> 5.0beta?
Hi Roni,
thanks for looking into this. I think the real question to ask is whether
we still support the security manager or not. Changes related to the
p
The security manager's example in chapter 13 used to work on the "::requires"
statement as well,
sometimes in the past, if my memory serves me right.
Analyzing what happens it becomes clear that .method~new, .method~newfile,
.routine~new and
.routine~newfile will initialize the supplied code (re
