Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

On my debian based system the file is in the package ‘apache2-dev’ have you installed that package? > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are > compiled for 2.2) and for

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

https://ci.apache.org/projects/httpd/trunk/doxygen/ap__config_8h_source.html > On Jan 23, 2017, at 9:39 PM, Terry Fuller wrote: > > Hello all, > > I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are > compiled for 2.2) and for 64-bit operation. I'm

[Oorexx-devel] Help Compiling mod_rexx

Hello all, I'm trying to compile mod_rexx for httpd 2.4 (the available binaries are compiled for 2.2) and for 64-bit operation. I'm getting an error message from the make: \httpd-2.4.25-x64-vc14\Apache24\include\httpd.h(44): fatal error C1083: Cannot open include file: 'ap_config.h': No such

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Ad Mac installation ...(Re: [Bsf4oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: important to see, whether it works for everyone else as well and what kind of problems (including "usability") problems that might be still there. So I appreciate your efforts very much! In summary, yes, * everything that I myself do on the Mac with

[Oorexx-devel] ooRexx 4.2.0 having a problem ooRexx 5.0.0 does not have ...

While working on the new version of BSF4ooRexx I created a rather complex GUI application with JavaFX (samples/JavaFX/fxml_03/MainApp.rex) that causes a runtime error with 4.2.0. It seems that looking up directories causes at one point to return a wrong object. (The application heavily uses

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [Bsf4oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > It should be in the Application folder: "ooRexx" > ("/Applications/ooRexx.app"). Opening it should bring up the > mentioned BSF4ooRexx menu and you should be able to run the ooRexxTry.rxj GUI > application. Thanks, found that ... I guess I didn't use that before,

[Oorexx-devel] Ad Mac installation ...(Re: [Bsf4oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Hi Jack, On 23.01.2017 15:55, Jack Woehr wrote: > Jack Woehr wrote: >> Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >>> One thing everyone can do to test the installation and the information > Oops, I found the jar ... forgot that Sierra moves everything to /Library > instead of /System/Library Actually it is the

Re: [Oorexx-devel] [Bsf4oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Hi Jack, On 23.01.2017 15:45, Jack Woehr wrote: > Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> >> One thing everyone can do to test the installation and the information: >> choose the menu on MacOSX >> "BSF4ooRexx -> Open Object Rexx -> ooRexxTry" on the other systems the menu >> "BSF4ooRexx -> GUI >> RexxTry

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Jack Woehr wrote: > Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> >> One thing everyone can do to test the installation and the information Oops, I found the jar ... forgot that Sierra moves everything to /Library instead of /System/Library -- Jack Woehr # "Democracy is the theory that the common

[Oorexx-devel] Question ad allowing to link to librexx[api].{so|dylib} for ooRexx 4.2 and 5.0 at the same time

While working on a new version of BSF4ooRexx library there is a need to link against ooRexx 4.2 and ooRexx 5.0 beta. On Linux and MacOSX I have been linking *without* any version numbers, i.e. with the flags Linux (g++): -lrexx -lrexxapi -lrexxutil MacOSX (gcc-alias for Clang):

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: One thing everyone can do to test the installation and the information: choose the menu on MacOSX "BSF4ooRexx -> Open Object Rexx -> ooRexxTry" on the other systems the menu "BSF4ooRexx -> GUI RexxTry Program (ooRexxTry.rxj)". Hi Rony -- After install, 1. I don't

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > > From now on that package will carry the correct name after unzipping. Sorry > for the inconvenience! Thanks for clarifying, I'll give it a try! -- Jack Woehr # "Democracy is the theory that the common people Box 51, Golden CO 80402 # know what they

Re: [Oorexx-devel] New version of BSF4ooRexx (v600.20170122), including a 64-Bit Apple package

Hi Jack, On 23.01.2017 01:51, Jack Woehr wrote: > Just downloaded but when I unzip the packages says it is OORexx 4.2.0, not > 5.0.0 > > Rony G. Flatscher wrote: >> >> Hi there, >> >> a new version of the ooRexx-Java-bridge "BSF4ooRexx" has been uploaded to >>