Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad AddCommandHandler()
I suggest you look at the test command handler that Erich just added to the test cases. This will show you how the command handlers are implemented and how to use the redirection APIs. Rick On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 4:14 PM Rony G Flatscher wrote: > How does the implentation (have to?) differ? > > The readon of asking: once ooRexx 5 gets released, I plan a version of > BSF4ooRexx that exploits the new ooRexx features. > > As the current version already supports command handlers implemented in > Java (or in ooRexx via BSF4ooRexx) at interpreter creation time, I would > like to support this new API in all of its facets. > > —-rony > > > Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e) > > Am 28.01.2019 um 21:15 schrieb Rick McGuire : > > The two handler types have different call signatures. When you register > the handler, you are telling the interpreter which call signature is used > to call the handler. > > Rick > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:43 PM Rony G. Flatscher > wrote: > >> Question ad new C++ method "context->AddCommandEnvironment(name, handler, >> type);", where the documentaiton for "type" reads: >> >> "type": The type of command handler to add. DIRECT_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT >> for a command handler with no support for redirection. >> REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for a command handler that supports >> redirection. >> >> How would the "handler" become able to support the new >> "REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT" ability? How could the "handler" >> determine whether redirection is in place and if so, what should it >> do/support for each kind of redirection? >> >> ---rony >> >> >> ___ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >> > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad AddCommandHandler()
How does the implentation (have to?) differ? The readon of asking: once ooRexx 5 gets released, I plan a version of BSF4ooRexx that exploits the new ooRexx features. As the current version already supports command handlers implemented in Java (or in ooRexx via BSF4ooRexx) at interpreter creation time, I would like to support this new API in all of its facets. —-rony Rony G. Flatscher (mobil/e) > Am 28.01.2019 um 21:15 schrieb Rick McGuire : > > The two handler types have different call signatures. When you register the > handler, you are telling the interpreter which call signature is used to call > the handler. > > Rick > >> On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:43 PM Rony G. Flatscher >> wrote: >> Question ad new C++ method "context->AddCommandEnvironment(name, handler, >> type);", where the documentaiton for "type" reads: >> >> "type": The type of command handler to add. DIRECT_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for a >> command handler with no support for redirection. >> REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for a command handler that supports >> redirection. >> >> How would the "handler" become able to support the new >> "REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT" ability? How could the "handler" determine >> whether redirection is in place and if so, what should it do/support for >> each kind of redirection? >> >> ---rony >> >> >> >> ___ >> Oorexx-devel mailing list >> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad AddCommandHandler()
The two handler types have different call signatures. When you register the handler, you are telling the interpreter which call signature is used to call the handler. Rick On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 1:43 PM Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Question ad new C++ method "context->AddCommandEnvironment(name, handler, > type);", where the documentaiton for "type" reads: > > "type": The type of command handler to add. DIRECT_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for > a command handler with no support for redirection. > REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for a command handler that supports > redirection. > > How would the "handler" become able to support the new > "REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT" ability? How could the "handler" > determine whether redirection is in place and if so, what should it > do/support for each kind of redirection? > > ---rony > > > ___ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
[Oorexx-devel] Question ad AddCommandHandler()
Question ad new C++ method "context->AddCommandEnvironment(name, handler, type);", where the documentaiton for "type" reads: "type": The type of command handler to add. DIRECT_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for a command handler with no support for redirection. REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT for a command handler that supports redirection. How would the "handler" become able to support the new "REDIRECTING_COMMAND_ENVIRONMENT" ability? How could the "handler" determine whether redirection is in place and if so, what should it do/support for each kind of redirection? ---rony ___ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
