Re: [Oorexx-devel] Findings (Re: Question ad native API for creating routine and package objects ...

[Rick McGuire]

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 12:00 PM Rony G. Flatscher 
wrote:

> Findings:
>
>- NewRoutine(name,code,sz) and LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz)
>behave the same (including not running the prolog code)
>- both are able to load plain Rexx source code,
>   - both fail for 'rexxc'-tokenized Rexx code (e.g. loaded from a
>   file or a database with tokenized Rexx code);
>   - will therefore file bugs for these two native APIs
>
>  - LoadPackage(filename): works for both, source code and
>tokenized code;
>- however, unlike LoadPackageFromData() it will run the prolog code
>   automatically; not sure whether this intentional or a bug
>
> LoadPackageFromData() is the bug. The prolog should always be run with
package loading operations.

Rick


>
>-
>
> ---rony
>
>
> On 06.04.2019 14:24, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
>
> On 06.04.2019 14:22, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> I'd say you should be able to. Whether you can or not is a question for
> some experimentation.
>
> Thank you, will start the experimentations then and report back.
>
> ---rony
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:13 AM Rony G. Flatscher 
> wrote:
>
>> In the native APIs these methods are available for creating Rexx routine
>> and package objects:
>>
>>1. NewRoutine(name, code, sz), where 'name' and 'code' are of type
>>CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
>>   - Question: can 'code' be any representation of a Rexx program,
>>   i.e. can one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>>
>>   2. LoadPackage(name), where name is of type CSTRING and denotes
>>the filename
>>
>>
>>- Question: can the file's content be any representation of a Rexx
>>program, i.e. can one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>>
>>
>>1. LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz), where 'name' and 'data' are of
>>type CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
>>   - Question: can 'data' be any representation of a Rexx program,
>>   i.e. can one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>>
>> ---rony
>>
>
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] Findings (Re: Question ad native API for creating routine and package objects ...

[Rony G. Flatscher]

Findings:

  * NewRoutine(name,code,sz) and LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz) behave the 
same (including not
running the prolog code)
  o both are able to load plain Rexx source code,
  o both fail for 'rexxc'-tokenized Rexx code (e.g. loaded from a file or a 
database with
tokenized Rexx code);
  + will therefore file bugs for these two native APIs

  * LoadPackage(filename): works for both, source code and tokenized code;
  o however, unlike LoadPackageFromData() it will run the prolog code 
automatically; not sure
whether this intentional or a bug

---rony


On 06.04.2019 14:24, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> On 06.04.2019 14:22, Rick McGuire wrote:
>> I'd say you should be able to. Whether you can or not is a question for some 
>> experimentation.
>
> Thank you, will start the experimentations then and report back.
>
> ---rony
>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:13 AM Rony G. Flatscher > > wrote:
>>
>> In the native APIs these methods are available for creating Rexx routine 
>> and package objects:
>>
>>  1. NewRoutine(name, code, sz), where 'name' and 'code' are of type 
>> CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
>>   * Question: can 'code' be any representation of a Rexx program, 
>> i.e. can one also
>> supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>>
>>  2. LoadPackage(name), where name is of type CSTRING and denotes the 
>> filename
>>
>>   * Question: can the file's content be any representation of a Rexx 
>> program, i.e. can
>> one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>>
>>  1. LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz), where 'name' and 'data' are of 
>> type CSTRING, 'sz' of
>> type size_t
>>   * Question: can 'data' be any representation of a Rexx program, 
>> i.e. can one also
>> supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>>
>> ---rony
>>

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad native API for creating routine and package objects ...

[Rony G. Flatscher]

On 06.04.2019 14:22, Rick McGuire wrote:
> I'd say you should be able to. Whether you can or not is a question for some 
> experimentation.

Thank you, will start the experimentations then and report back.

---rony

>
> On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:13 AM Rony G. Flatscher  > wrote:
>
> In the native APIs these methods are available for creating Rexx routine 
> and package objects:
>
>  1. NewRoutine(name, code, sz), where 'name' and 'code' are of type 
> CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
>   * Question: can 'code' be any representation of a Rexx program, 
> i.e. can one also supply
> the tokenized/compiled code?
>
>  2. LoadPackage(name), where name is of type CSTRING and denotes the 
> filename
>
>   * Question: can the file's content be any representation of a Rexx 
> program, i.e. can one
> also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>
>  1. LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz), where 'name' and 'data' are of 
> type CSTRING, 'sz' of
> type size_t
>   * Question: can 'data' be any representation of a Rexx program, 
> i.e. can one also supply
> the tokenized/compiled code?
>
> ---rony
>

___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Question ad native API for creating routine and package objects ...

[Rick McGuire]

I'd say you should be able to. Whether you can or not is a question for
some experimentation.

Rick

On Sat, Apr 6, 2019 at 8:13 AM Rony G. Flatscher 
wrote:

> In the native APIs these methods are available for creating Rexx routine
> and package objects:
>
>1. NewRoutine(name, code, sz), where 'name' and 'code' are of type
>CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
>   - Question: can 'code' be any representation of a Rexx program,
>   i.e. can one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>
>   2. LoadPackage(name), where name is of type CSTRING and denotes the
>filename
>
>
>- Question: can the file's content be any representation of a Rexx
>program, i.e. can one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>
>
>1. LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz), where 'name' and 'data' are of
>type CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
>   - Question: can 'data' be any representation of a Rexx program,
>   i.e. can one also supply the tokenized/compiled code?
>
> ---rony
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

[Oorexx-devel] Question ad native API for creating routine and package objects ...

[Rony G. Flatscher]

In the native APIs these methods are available for creating Rexx routine and 
package objects:

 1. NewRoutine(name, code, sz), where 'name' and 'code' are of type CSTRING, 
'sz' of type size_t
  * Question: can 'code' be any representation of a Rexx program, i.e. can 
one also supply the
tokenized/compiled code?

 2. LoadPackage(name), where name is of type CSTRING and denotes the filename

  * Question: can the file's content be any representation of a Rexx 
program, i.e. can one also
supply the tokenized/compiled code?

 1. LoadPackageFromData(name,data,sz), where 'name' and 'data' are of type 
CSTRING, 'sz' of type size_t
  * Question: can 'data' be any representation of a Rexx program, i.e. can 
one also supply the
tokenized/compiled code?

---rony
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel