On 2021-01-11 10:14:54 Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
> On February 24th 2021, it will be seven (!) years since the last official
> release of ooRexx took place, believe it or not!
>
> People who do not follow this list or the ooRexx code updates on
> Sourceforge will think, that maintenance, let alone
Now I found some text:
"Ticks
returns the number of seconds since 00:00:00.00 on 1 January 1970, in the
format:
(no leading zeros or whitespace).
The value returned by Date('T') can be used to calculate the interval
between any two dates. Note, however, that values returned
+1
I agree, but it is a responsibility of the development team. Last time I asked,
different showstoppers were identified, like in the documentation building
process and installers. The situation around those issues seems a lot better
now. We should ask again.
Developers, is there any reason
Can anyone explain this difference:
F:\>rexx datet
REXX-ooRexx_4.2.0(MT)_64-bit 6.04 22 Feb 2014
date('T',20210228,'S')=1614470400
F:\>regina datet
REXX-Regina_3.9.1(MT) 5.00 5 Apr 2015
date('T',20210228,'S')=1614466800
Difference of 3600 has probably to do with the time zone
Thanks in advance
+1
_
From: Cyril Randles [mailto:cyrilrand...@gmail.com]
Sent: 11 January 2021 16:49
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Seven years since the last release
I agree with Rony.
The beta version is of good quality
The reputation of Rexx needs to be
I agree with Rony.
The beta version is of good quality
The reputation of Rexx needs to be protected and enhanced by the
improvements.
Cyril
On Mon, 11 Jan 2021 at 16:15, Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> On February 24th 2021, it will be seven (!) years since the last official
> release of ooRexx
On February 24th 2021, it will be seven (!) years since the last official
release of ooRexx took
place, believe it or not!
People who do not follow this list or the ooRexx code updates on Sourceforge
will think, that
maintenance, let alone development, of ooRexx has ceased seven years ago! :(
