to
the samples. Is that OK?
Jon
On 11 June 2014 18:05, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
I say go for it. Whatever you think is useful, go ahead and do it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 10:00 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I've been going through
I'm guessing there might need to be some adjustments made in the build
suite for locating information in out-of-source builds. For example, I'm
sure the process of locating the headers required for building the native
api tests will require adjustment. The readme doesn't give any hints about
is wrong by right clicking on rxregexp.dll and
selecting properties. Some of the properties are not filled in, like they
are for some of the other DLLs, like rxsock.dll for instance.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 6:29 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'm guessing
I think it is ready to go, although it probably needs a round or two of
testing to make sure everything works. Right now, can build either of two
ways, the non-template based version you did (although this version is
probably out of date with respect to the samples) and the template-based
build I
flexible. Things like having the
.pdb files get included in the installer if you're building from a Debug
build is just one example.
Rick
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 3:52 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 12:47 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I
to say that I find the CMake system to be very flexible and,
after a little education, easy to work with. And highly system
independent.
When I recommended CMake I had no idea it would work as well as it has
for us.
David Ashley
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 16:16 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
No, I
David,
Could you take a look at what needs to be done in Makefile.am for the
changes to the samples? If I read what it's doing correctly, it is just
copying all of the .rex files. However, there are now a couple other files
in that directory (a .cls and a .txt) that would also need to be
Ashley
On Thu, 2014-06-12 at 18:35 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
David,
Could you take a look at what needs to be done in Makefile.am for the
changes to the samples? If I read what it's doing correctly, it is
just copying all of the .rex files. However, there are now a couple
other files
Ok, these should be fixed now.
Rick
On Thu, Jun 12, 2014 at 9:02 PM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rick -
Looks like you made some spelling errors in either the cmake file or the
file names for
syncronizedConcurrency.rex
usetree.rex
David Ashley
anyway.
Rick
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 8:40 AM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
wrote:
Nope. The file manifest is actually in the rpm spec file and the deb
manifest file. The magic happens there.
David Ashley
On Fri, 2014-06-13 at 05:36 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok, my biggest
This is something I've been thinking about for some time, and we even have
a couple of RFEs open for something like this (though in fairness, I opened
one of these). On occasion, I find I'd like to write a program that needs
some associated data. Coding the data as a series of assignment
be can simple syntax, and not require directives, it can be
compatible with a NetRexx implementation.
René.
On 14 jun. 2014, at 15:42, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
This is something I've been thinking about for some time, and we even
have a couple of RFEs open for something like
This is similar to MIME encoding, but ooRexx already has the directive
concept that breaks the code into units. That is the link into the address
space/naming mechanism. I have toyed with also adding Mime sort of typing
mechanisms to this, but I think I'd prefer to keep this simple right now,
On Sat, Jun 14, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com wrote:
This is similar to MIME encoding, but ooRexx already has the directive
concept that breaks the code into units. That is the link into the address
space/naming mechanism. I have toyed with also adding Mime sort of
Not really highlighted much, but the new StackFrame class gives some very
useful debugging techniques. I just used a couple of these to figure out a
problem.
If you are interactive trace mode and want to find out how you got to a
specific place, issue the command
say
If you want to see what are getting used for the compile and links, you can
specify nmake VERBOSE=1, and it will display all of the commands that
nmake is issuing. This allows you to see the exact commands getting issued
for the build steps.
Rick
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Mark Miesfeld
, Jun 15, 2014 at 2:06 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
If you want to see what are getting used for the compile and links, you
can specify nmake VERBOSE=1, and it will display all of the commands that
nmake is issuing. This allows you to see the exact commands getting issued
\client
-Ic:\ORexxDev\oorexx\rexxapi\client\platform\windows
-Ic:\ORexxDev\oorexx\rexxapi\common
-Ic:\ORexxDev\oorexx\rexxapi\common\platform\windows
Rick
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Shoot, I stand corrected. It appears nmake writes all of the options
, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't have time to do the link, but adding an echo did work. Here is
the value of the CXX_FLAGS for compiling the files in rexx.dll. I don't
have time to compare these to the old build right now:
CXX_FLAGS=/DWIN32
/D_WINDOWS
/W3
/GR
/EHsc
I see you figured this out already. Was it really necessary to set the
_DEBUG and _RELEASE flags? I suspect the top level version would be
sufficient.
Rick
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 9:04 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, should be pretty easy to fix this. A few questions:
1
I think you posted this as a reply to wrong email thread!
That was my original proposal, although I had a default data marker of
::ENDDATA. The user is then free to override that marker to any other
unique value.
Rick
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 10:49 AM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
Not sure what you mean...::Data directives are paired with an end marker,
so
::Data data1
::enddata
::Data data2
::enddata
Is perfectly well defined syntax. The end marker does not need to be
uniquely defined for every directive and in generally, the end marker only
needs to be redefined if
in a single
package? In this case we would need to determine which one we wanted to
work with.
David Ashley
On Mon, 2014-06-16 at 11:09 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
Not sure what you mean...::Data directives are paired with an end
marker, so
::Data data1
::enddata
::Data data2
Oops, made a copy error...or more precisely, a forget to copy error :-)
Rick
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 5:07 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
With a CMake build, the MutableBuffer class is missing caselessPos:
C:\work.ooRexx\wc\ooTest\4.xqtest.rex
3 *-* say
Well, the complete list can be found in the CMakeList.txt file. Search for
install_component_shortcut, install_rexx_shortcut, and install_doc_shortcut
in the control file. Quite a few of these would only apply on Windows
(e.g., ooRexxTry and a lot of ooDialog samples).
Rick
On Tue, Jun 17,
Jon,
The icla you committed does not have any of Rony's information in it.
Rick
-- Forwarded message --
From: sahana...@users.sf.net
Date: Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 1:46 PM
Subject: [Oorexx-svn] SF.net SVN: oorexx-code-0:[10237]
To: oorexx-...@lists.sourceforge.net
Revision: 10237
at the bottom?
If that is not acceptable I will go back to him.
Jon
On 23 June 2014 18:55, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Jon,
The icla you committed does not have any of Rony's information in it.
Rick
-- Forwarded message --
From: sahana...@users.sf.net
Date: Mon
)
On 23.06.2014 21:00, Rick McGuire wrote:
I think you need to double check what you checked in. This appears to be
just a copy of the blank agreement. I see nothing at all from Rony in that
file.
Rick
On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 2:00 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz
Yeah, that's probably a question for sourceforge. I don't know what
happened to the old content.
Rick
On Tue, Jun 24, 2014 at 2:52 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz wrote:
This may end up being a question for Sourceforge, but does anyone know
what happened to the ooRexx
not changed
since the beginning of the ooRexx project; in addition being a
member of RexxLA this information is available as well).
HTH,
---rony (currently on the road)
On 23.06.2014 21:00, Rick McGuire wrote:
I think you need to double check what you checked in. This
appears
I was hacking on the DO instruction code today in my sandbox and I noticed
something neat in how the code functions. With the little tweak to the
complex.cls sample that I just committed, the following code works:
comp1 = .complex[1,2]
comp2 = .complex[4,5]
comp3 = .complex[1,1]
loop i = comp1
It loops once more, as expected.
Rick
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 4:58 PM, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
wrote:
what happens if .complex[4,6]
?
Walter Pachl
Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com schrieb:
Kewl ... sort of like the generality of loop .. over.
I was hacking
I asked the question about using the CMake build to generate files in the
source tree on the cmake mailing list today, and people didn't see there
there should be any problems with doing that. I took a crack at it, and
have it working now, including making this step optional if xalan is not
On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 12:04 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
When analyzing WWW-browser script code embedded in (x)html files it is
the case that the functions of all scripts embedded in a (x)html file are
available for scripts that are encountered and executed later in a
Rony,
If you want this investigated, then you need to file the bug report first
with a means of reproducing this.
Rick
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 7:21 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
Could grab some time to test adding a package to the context of another
routine from
...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
Rick,
On 03.07.2014 13:39, Rick McGuire wrote:
If you want this investigated, then you need to file the bug report
first with a means of
reproducing this.
Thank you for the offer!
While trying to come up with an ooRexx-only example for this observed
behavior, I found
-and-paste the source lines into the description.
Rick
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rick McGuire bigr...@users.sf.net
Date: Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:09 AM
Subject: [oorexx:bugs] #1270 Unexpected recursion leading to error 11,
Control stack full
To: [oorexx:bugs] 1
Since I'm in the process of rewriting the parser this might be a good time
to consider this point. For Method and Routine objects created from
directives, the source() method does not return the directive line. Should
it? This is a change to what is currently returned, which has the
potential
value a separate method for the name of the routine or method. I
would be happy to parse it out of the directive line text or perhaps it
should have it's own separate method.
Jon
On Jul 4, 2014 12:35 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
On 04.07.2014 12:33, Rick McGuire wrote
the gun on the name part. There are even ways that
methods can get created without the internal name.
Rick
thanks,
Jon
On 4 July 2014 22:44, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Wow, I would have assumed that was there already. Sounds like you should
open an RFE for this. But note
Nope, works fine on Windows. The code that handles this in
platform/unix/UseridFunction.cpp and is dependent on a couple HAVE_*
defines. I suspect there's still a problem with config.h.
Rick
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:19 PM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
wrote:
Rick -
I was doing
Just a guess, but in CMakeLists.txt, the check for getpwuid function
appears to be setting the HAVE_GETPUID variable, but the code is looking
for HAVE_GETPWUID (missing W).
Rick
On Wed, Jul 9, 2014 at 5:35 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Nope, works fine on Windows. The code
The code, in general, is separated into common and platform sections,
although there are multiple platform pieces for different components. For
example, the interpreter component has a platform section, the extensions
component has a platform section, etc. There is also a set of components
that
Assuming I understand what you're really asking, this is definitely doable.
Here's a small example showing how to invoke an ooRexx program.
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/code-0/HEAD/tree/main/trunk/utilities/rexx/platform/unix/rexx.cpp
This actually uses two different methods, the older
I've been working on a fairly major code restructuring and cleanup over the
last couple of weeks. This will make it easier to implement some new
features, and hopefully, will make it easier to maintain release-to-release
compatibility of the rexxc compiled images.
Because this update is going to
of things easier in the
future.
Rick
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:06 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
On 14.07.2014 22:03, Rick McGuire wrote:
I've been working on a fairly major code restructuring and cleanup over
the last couple of weeks.
This will make it easier
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
On 15.07.2014 12:31, Rick McGuire wrote:
Well, the thing I started out to fix is to allow the language translator
mark a saved program with
the language level required to execute the program. One
Grrr, hit the wrong key and sent that early.
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 6:44 AM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
On 15.07.2014 12:31, Rick McGuire wrote:
Well, the thing I started out to fix is to allow the language translator
mark a saved program with
the language level
I've been doing a bit of work on the collection classes this week, and just
got to the directory class. The directory is most frequently used as a
collection class where the indexes are string items, but it also has the
additional feature of the SETMETHOD() method, plus some additional methods
2009 symposium presentation).
Jon
On 17 July 2014 11:42, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I've been doing a bit of work on the collection classes this week, and
just got to the directory class. The directory is most frequently used as
a collection class where the indexes are string
There are a number of things I don't like about the existing Message class,
the biggest being the object can only be invoked a single time. There are
lots of useful things that can be done with a message-type object that can
be passed in as a argument...for example, iteration type operations on
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
Currently, I am looking deeper into the RAISE keyword instruction. The
reason being, that conditions
trapped in a parallel thread (let us say #2) should be re-raised in the
(blocked) thread (let us say
#1) that
.
Rick
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
On 29.07.2014 19:23, Rick McGuire wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:11 PM, Rony G. Flatscher
rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at wrote:
Currently, I am looking deeper into the RAISE keyword instruction
. You then download the
diagram(s) and use them as you please. Maintenance should be pretty
easy.
David Ashley
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 13:46 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
I can't say I'm crazy about the appearance...the yellow color is a
little jarring and the text is a bit difficult to read
if needed.
David Ashley
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 14:54 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
What form are the diagrams in? I'm a little nervous about being
dependent upon the website vs. having a a build tool that we can just
use directly. If this actually spit out some form of markup, then
we'd
in the pdf. 50% seemed like a good compromise but reducing it further
might make the text and lines look better in the pdf but might cause
problems in the html rendering. We might have to experiment to see what
is better.
David Ashley
On Wed, 2014-07-30 at 15:15 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
Ok
FindClass is a thread context API, which is invoked outside of the context
of any running code. As such, it is limited to locating those classes that
are provided by the system (i.e., in .environment). FindContextClass
performs the same sort of search that would occur in any piece of Rexx code
objects)
rtc-SendMessage1(cbd-rxDbusServer, NEWCONNECTION, rxDBusConn);
}
On 31.07.2014 13:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 31.07.2014 13:44, Rick McGuire wrote:
FindClass is a thread context API, which is invoked outside of the context
of any running code. As such, it is limited
and listener objects)
rtc-SendMessage1(cbd-rxDbusServer, NEWCONNECTION, rxDBusConn);
}
On 31.07.2014 13:52, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
On 31.07.2014 13:44, Rick McGuire wrote:
FindClass is a thread context API, which is invoked outside of the context
of any running code
That looks much better to me, and the text still looks sharp at the lower
resolutions, so I think the SVG format is making a difference.
Rick
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 11:57 AM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
wrote:
I built a new rexxref.pdf and this time I used the SVG version of the
Well, ooRexx already uses something like that. The objects stored in the
object variables are variable objects. The language translator assigns all
named variables a slot position in the local stack frame for fast lookup.
The expose operation just looks up the variable object in the scope
Only if you are invoking it from the context of a native method of the same
object.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 7, 2014 at 2:45 PM, Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at
wrote:
Is it possible to access private methods from native code, and if so, how
would one do it?
---rony
I confess that I've been wanting a shortcut for creating arrays for a long
time and have even considered submitting this feature request myself. This
is not something difficult to implement, but my resistance to doing this
has more to do with the fact that it introduces new syntax.
Using square
Another idea I've been toying with for a while is adding a square brackets
method to the string class. This is a little bit like substr(), but the
default length is 1 rather than the rest of the string. This would be
fairly natural for scanning/parsing applications where you are looking at
this for collections as well. Returning a subset of an array for example.
--
Brandon Cherry
On 9/18/2014 9:32 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
Another idea I've been toying with for a while is adding a square
brackets method to the string class. This is a little bit like
substr(), but the default
I think these do need to be bracketed, since the , is already used in the
IF/WHEN instruction and with DO WHILE/UNTIL for the shortcut AND
conditionals. Square brackets are already used as a message type
(primarily with collection objects), but thankfully, the usage follows the
same rules as
is
the least user friendly language I have ever encountered.
Bottom line, syntactic sugar should only be added when it clearly
enhances productivity or makes the code easier to read.
David Ashley
On Thu, 2014-09-18 at 13:41 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
I think these do need to be bracketed, since
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com wrote:
I think these do need to be bracketed, since the , is already used in
the IF/WHEN instruction and with DO WHILE/UNTIL for the shortcut AND
conditionals.
Ah, but can one not think of those lists as arrays? And
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com
wrote:
I think these do need to be bracketed, since the , is already used in
the IF/WHEN instruction and with DO WHILE/UNTIL for the shortcut
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:55 PM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com
wrote:
On further reflection, the conditional expression cannot be merged with a
simple redefinition. The conditional expressions have the shortcut
feature where not all of the expressions need to be evaluated. The
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 2:25 PM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com wrote:
On further reflection, the conditional expression cannot be merged with
a simple redefinition. The conditional expressions have the shortcut
feature where not all of the expressions need to be evaluated. The
I have to apologize, I was so excited about getting the base tests working
on the 5.0 version that I merged the changes back in to trunk, completely
forgetting that I hadn't tried compiling on Linux first. I'm getting some
compile issues in the non-platform code that are driving me a little
Since the size of this parameter changes with the bitness, you would be
better off using a parameter type that also changes with bitness. size_t
or ssize_t would probably be better choices. size_t is unsigned, ssize_t
is signed.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 10:41 AM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com
wrote:
On further reflection, the conditional expression cannot be merged
with a simple redefinition. The conditional expressions have the
shortcut feature where not all of the expressions need to be evaluated.
The
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 12:51 PM, Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com
wrote:
How can we explore alternatives when ooRexx has been using the commas
since the 4.0 release. any change in that behavior will break lots of
programs. There's also the issue of netrexx compatibility, but that's
Ok, I'm able to get a clean build on Fedora. Please let me know if there
are any other build issues.
Rick
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 6:46 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I have to apologize, I was so excited about getting the base tests working
on the 5.0 version that I merged
MethodArguments_Include
*^~~*
MethodArguments_Included
2 warnings and 1 error generated.
make: *** [librexx_la-ArrayClass.lo] Error 1
MacOSX 10.9.4
best regards,
René.
On 20 sep. 2014, at 21:56, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, I'm able to get
Never mind, I found it. Now I'm puzzled as to why Linux did not have the
same problem.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
These should be fixed now, but I'm curious about where the define for
PACKAGE came from. I couldn't find it anywhere
, the ooRexx was
surrounded by quotes, which caused the syntax error. I'm not sure if this
additional quoting will cause issues with its intended purpose or not.
I'll check a new fix in just as soon as everything finishes compiling.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
: *** No rule to make target `interpreter/classes/StackClass.cpp',
needed by `librexx_la-StackClass.lo'. Stop.
best regards,
René.
On 20 sep. 2014, at 22:48, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I also discovered that my fix will have the same problem because there is
also a PACKAGE_STRING
try that later today.
best regards,
René.
On 21 sep. 2014, at 00:43, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, you got me. There are no references to a StackClass in the
CmakeList.txt file nor anywhere in the build tree. I have no idea where
this comes from.
Rick
On Sat, Sep 20
that the build machine includes ooDialog in the
build?
thanks,
Jon
On 20 September 2014 15:23, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
It should build...provided I haven't broken something :-)
Rick
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz wrote:
Hi
of the released and proven stand-alones
into the main version, but I would suggest not today.
Jon
On 21 September 2014 15:38, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, ok, this is a situation where Mark's input would be helpful. The
build machine builds the ooDialog version
? (I have not edited the subversion server file and every line in
it is no-opped so passwords should be saved). I'm sure I didn't have to do
this in the long-ago past.
thanks
Jon
On 21 September 2014 16:14, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
The newer files in the trunk version
/
Rick
thanks
Jon
On 21 September 2014 16:14, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
The newer files in the trunk version are probably my fault. I made a few
changes while working on my update, but I believe all of my changes were
associated with comments.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014
I tried yet another log request - it asked for my password 3 times
crazy! It seems completely random to me.
On 21 September 2014 18:04, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz wrote:
Hi RIck
.
On 21 September 2014 18:04, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers
sahana...@windhorse.biz wrote:
Hi RIck,
that seems to be the case for a few of the files.
Others you changed to make the build work (rexx64.exe.manifest
]: *** [CMakeFiles/rexx.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
best regards,
René.
On 21 sep. 2014, at 13:03, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
That's supposed to happen automatically when the list updates, but it
might be a good idea to start from a clean state.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21
'gettimeofday'*
gettimeofday(tv, NULL);
*^*
1 error generated.
make[2]: ***
[CMakeFiles/rexx.dir/interpreter/platform/unix/TimeSupport.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/rexx.dir/all] Error 2
René.
On 21 sep. 2014, at 21:15, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I just
] Error 2
René.
On 21 sep. 2014, at 21:15, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I just checked in a new ErrorMessages.cpp file. See if that fixes the
problem.
Rick
On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 2:55 PM, René Jansen rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote:
Generated with Cmake, now previous error gone
let you know.
René.
On 22 sep. 2014, at 00:41, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
I just checked in a tweak to TimeSupport to use the defines created in
config.h rather than the AIX define for deciding which header to include.
If this still fails, there might be a problem with how
sep. 2014, at 01:18, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll probably need to debug and figure out where this is either hung or
looping and get a stack traceback if you can. rexximage hung on linux when
we were first converting to cmake and the problem ended up being issues
analysis of process 1660 written to file /dev/stdout
indeed it seems to be in a mutexwait, semaphore code.
best regards,
René.
On 22 sep. 2014, at 01:18, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
You'll probably need to debug and figure out where this is either hung or
looping and get
/RexxCompiler.cpp.o]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/rexxc.dir/all] Error 2
where last night the compile was clean.
best regards,
René.
On 22 sep. 2014, at 02:07, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing David used to figure out this problem on Linux was to build the
4.2.0 version
generated.
make[2]: ***
[CMakeFiles/rexxc.dir/utilities/rexxc/platform/unix/RexxCompiler.cpp.o]
Error 1
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/rexxc.dir/all] Error 2
where last night the compile was clean.
best regards,
René.
On 22 sep. 2014, at 02:07, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
One
Well, if it's missing files needed for those platforms, obviously it isn't.
Rick
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 3:20 PM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
wrote:
The tar.gz file is for all *nix platforms.
David Ashley
On Mon, 2014-09-22 at 11:13 -0700, CVBruce wrote:
And so if you want to
David,
Bruce's first email has the details. There are separate aix and mac
directories in the server platform directory. Not all customizations are
done via #define.
Rick
On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 4:28 PM, David Ashley w.david.ash...@gmail.com
wrote:
What files seem to be missing? Platform
19:43, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Jon,
Just tried this again and got better results this time. I'm using the
cygwin ssh implementation, so I followed the OpenSSH instructions. I don't
know if this made any difference or not, but I deleted all of my previous
keys this time so
It's probably worth having this conversation now that this standard has
been out for 3 years now and compiler support seems to be pretty good.
As I've been doing the code cleanup on the trunk version, I've had a number
of times where a search on how to do something in C++ gave hits to C++11
with the ooRexx 5.0 version.
David Ashley
On Tue, 2014-09-23 at 09:36 -0400, Rick McGuire wrote:
It's probably worth having this conversation now that this standard
has been out for 3 years now and compiler support seems to be pretty
good.
As I've been doing the code cleanup on the trunk
1201 - 1300 of 2203 matches
Mail list logo
