Can anyone on this list explain the reason behind the '//' and '%' methods of
this sample class.
(Still) interested in mathematics
Walter Pachl
and a real question about rxMath
The doc says that the functions should fail when a precision 16 is demanded
explicitly or by default.
Should
Well I just observer what is returned.
I am sure that the 16 digits returned are not always correct (when I compare
them with my results computed to nnn digits.
The code would have to be changed by someone else, as I said.
Walter
No opinion on // and % of complex?
- Original Message -
This little program
Numeric Digits 100
Do x=0 To pi(100)/2 by 0.1
a=rxCalcSin(x,30,'R')
b=sin(x,50)
Say x a
Say x b
Say ' '
End
::requires rxmath library
gives me 5 wrong results (out of 16 test cases)
I have marked them with ***:
0 0
0 0
0.1 0.09983341664682816 ***
0.1
I see your point, of course!
So
1. doc should say what's done
2. doc should say what's done
3. We may have to distinguish 2 cases, implied versus explicit precision:
a) x=rxCalcSin(0.5,,'R') where Numeric Digits is set to 20, say
b) x=rxCalcSin(0.5,30,'R') explicitly asking for more than can be
if the first argument
is rounded in any way)
Sorry
Walter
- Original Message -
From: Walter Pachl pa...@chello.at
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2009 6:54 PM
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] rxmath
I see your point
In a state of shock I ask this question:
Is the syntax description in the manuals wrong?
It says that
The --- symbol indicates the beginning of a statement.
and
The --- symbol indicates that the statement syntax is continued on the next
line.
and
Diagrams of syntactical units other than
- Original Message -
From: Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
if a doc update was missed regarding this error, then the documentation
should be fixed.
Rick
Most definitely so, I'd say.
If that's the decision I volunteer to work on the update of the rxmath.doc.
Walter
I got this private note from development (guess who!):
My advice would be to not worry too much about the railroad track
diagrams. grin None of the, current, people working on the docs
like them and we've already reached a consensus that we would replace
them if: we reach a consensus on what to
Apparently there is not much interest in that.
(I got a private note that my syntax would not be readable by many people
and that there are nicer railroad diagrams
(that would not be visible on the host).
Anyway:
Should I open a bug for the documented precision limit???
Has anybody looked at my
Servus emsiger Werker!--
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application
Eager to try it tomorrow
Thanks
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm) Developer Program
Be part of this innovative community and reach millions of netbook users
worldwide. Take advantage of special
Rexx on the stick
Works for me
CMD Window
set path=%PATH%;e:
rexx whatever...
Didn't find where to set the user path on Vista (but never mind)
Thanks y'all
Walter
--
Sell apps to millions through the Intel(R) Atom(Tm)
1. Can Win 7 64 bit run 32 bit binariaes and DLLs?
That's what I do
Walter
--
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your
He asked for 6.
Greetings from icy Vienna
Walter
- Original Message -
From: Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2012 8:06 PM
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Just curious about missing
missing exit numbers ...
Oops, mistyped. 6 was the memory exit.
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:14 PM, Walter Pachl pa...@chello.at wrote:
He asked for 6.
Greetings from icy Vienna
Walter
- Original Message -
From: Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
To: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing
Looking up Parse In the Language Reference, I noticed 2 Doc Problems:
The sybtax diagram does not allow for Parse Caseless Upper ... which is
accepted by the Interpreter
-PARSE--+-+---++---
+-UPPER-++-CASELESS-+
There are already entries for Rexx and ooRexx (and NetRexx)
Naively I created the one for ooRexx.
see my append to rexxla mailing list
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways
Wo ich hingreif: Zores :-)
(whatever I touch: Problems)
Greetings
Walter
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com schrieb:
I didn't receive a notification on that either, which is strange,
since recently I've started receiving two emails for all tracker
updates. Not sure what has changed
Who is master of ooRexx on Sourceforge?
The examples section on it is deplorable
Maybe one could now point at rosettacode.org (as Rick prodused tons of
examples)
Found this address on sourceforge.
iWeaveRexx@users.sourceforge
Sent a question:
Who are you?
Walter
Back came
it, but the subject isn't what you say, but instead the somewhat
meaningless Reference 7.4.13:
Submitted By: Walter Pachl (walterpachl)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Reference 7.4.13
Initial Comment:
Algorithm for changestr does not mention the optional count
Ganz was anderes:
Hab ich eine Chance diese Unschönheit zu verbessern?
Gibt es eine editable source?
David Ashley hat mich auf seine sandbox verwiesen aber die finde ich nicht
und im SF finde ich nur PDF und HTML
Beides nicht recht editierbar
LG
Walter
Oops. This was meant to be private :-( -- as you can deduce from the language
used :-)
Walter
Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at schrieb:
Ganz was anderes:
Hab ich eine Chance diese Unschönheit zu verbessern?
Gibt es eine editable source?
David Ashley hat mich auf seine sandbox
Did ou see my doc ticket for rexxref?
Walter
Von: Rick McGuire [mailto:object.r...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21. September 2012 14:46
An: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Betreff: [Oorexx-devel] Missing tracker notifications
I just discovered there have been multiple tracker
Thanks Rick,
You really need to have a better understanding of what objects are
Trying ;:-(
Is my delta (16 vs. 17) of any use?
Walter
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their production app looks like.
Hmm
I tried what you've shown me by using c and cc (differering hash identities)
i1 = abc
and
i2=i1~copy
works as expected
sigh
have a nice weekend
Walter
--
Got visibility?
Most devs has no idea what their
While studying I noticed these points in rexxref.pdf:
5.3.8.3. init -init(--size--)
should be new
5.3.8.5. push
If option is 'Unique', any matching item already in the queue ...
should be items (plural)
5.3.8.6. queue
also plural
5.3.8.7. resize
If the previous size was larger than newSize,
I am learning!
If someone (needn't be you, Rick) says: You are right - I will.
It saves me some time if my question regarding the supplier is answered
instead of becoming a rejected bug.)
Von: Rick McGuire [mailto:object.r...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 27. September 2012 01:12
An:
detail/question everyone on the list gets a
copy.
Putting it into the tracking system means that only the people who can/will
fix
it have to read it. And of course, each one can be tracked individually which
helps everyone.
Mike
_
From: Walter Pachl
I did read this and dummy me tried a
do item over s :-(
This is now settled clear and I shall open the doc ticket
Thanks
Walter
--
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Before I enter another invalid bug
(is 1122 really invalid? Why does makestring not use the required string value
of objects
and is the use of null string worth documenting?)
here is a little program and 2 questions:
Q1: Why is 1 A in relation r12 (it is in r2)
Q2: Why is r1a identical to r1 (is
Q1: this is NOT what I read in the description-- maybe a doc error (or a bug)
Q2: understood: z´this would have neen an invalid bug (which I wanted to avoid)
Walter
--
Don't let slow site performance ruin your business.
Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at schrieb:
Q1: this is NOT what I read in the description-- maybe a doc error (or a bug)
Q2: understood: z´this would have neen an invalid bug (which I wanted to avoid)
Walter
Q1: a) doc b) bug c) my fault
Q2: can a kind soul provide an example whare
that only ONE U/U pair is 'subtracted' from r (this relates to Q1)
Have a nice week
Walter
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Walter Pachl [mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 07. Oktober 2012 08:00
An: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [Oorexx-devel
Two questions / observations regarding rexxref.pdf:
5.3.2. The Collection Class
5.3.2.16. union
...
-union(argument)-
The argument must also allow all of the index values in the receiver collection.
add: The ITEMS in the argument must be acceptable by the receiver
collection.
5.3.15. The
Also
es gibt einen Installation Guide
Kann man (kannst du) ein kurzes Rexx programm schreiben das sagt was da ist
bzw. was fehlt.
Mich aufzufordern ooRexx zu installieren ist irgendwie überflüssig!
Java hab ich auch sicher...
LG
Walter
This was, of course, meant for Rony's eyes only!!!
Greetings
Walter
Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at schrieb:
Also
es gibt einen Installation Guide
Kann man (kannst du) ein kurzes Rexx programm schreiben das sagt was da ist
bzw. was fehlt.
Mich aufzufordern ooRexx zu
This little program:
Signal On Lostdigits
x=7
Do i=1 To 5
x=x+1
say x
End
Exit
lostdigits:
Say 'This is what SIZE is in PL/I'
shows this output:
8
9
1.E+9
1.E+9
1.E+9
I have expected that the lostdigits condition is trapped. It ain't!!.
significant digits, the condition is
never triggered.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.atwrote:
This little program:
Signal On Lostdigits
x=7
Do i=1 To 5
x=x+1
say x
End
Exit
lostdigits:
Say 'This is what SIZE
I am working on this:
I want to implement this little and simple program using oodialog:
Do Until wordlist=''
word=subword(wordlist,random...)
display screen 1
upon enter
display screen 2
If respone=F1 Then drop the word
End
Say bye or display Bye bye
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
And how about
x=11
Do i=1 To 5
Numeric dIGITS 30
x=x+1 - 12
Say x
Numeric Digits 9
z=x+0 - 1.E+9
Say z
End
I THINK you started by sending me a private mail
I knew xou would!
THANKS in advance
Walter
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com schrieb:
I can help you with this, give me a little bit of time to put something
--
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for
A
I shall enter a but!
Glad to have helped :-)
Walter
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com schrieb:
Looks like a boundary condition bug. The condition is raised for lengths
of digits+2, but not digits+1.
Rick
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 5:18 PM, Walter Pachl
christel.u.w.pa
Thanks a million!
Works like a charm.
Two points though:
Rexx version says Version REXX-ooRexx_4.1.1(MT) 6.03 16 May 2012
Should it not say 4.2.0 ??
And
germanWords = .array~of('Vater', 'Matter', 'Gutan','Tag')
should be
germanWords = .array~of('Vater', 'Mutter', 'Guten','Tag')
Thanks for clarification of 4.1.1.
Ah one question: why woud it not work on earlier ooRexx version(s)??
now: which is a ,new' feature? (WAS a questionI)
For one, it uses the new C++ native extension mechanism, so it could not
work on any ooRexx before 4.0.0. But, it also uses two API
post scriptum
wheras the second /* in this line is recognized
/* x='3/*1' */say x 4711
the -- in this line is not
/* x='3--1' */say x 4711
is this correct?
should one add that -- *outside of literal strings and comments is recognized
as start of a line command ??
Sigh again
Walter
great.
thanx
--
Walter Pachl
Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com schrieb:
Hi Walter,
1.10.3. Comments
The interpreter recognizes the following types of comments:
. A line comment, where the comment is limited to one line .
The standard Rexx comment, where the comment can cover
such as
Do
say 2*2,
;End
note the traling semicolons omitted
How about Interpret ' Interpret ...' ??
--
Walter Pachl
Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com schrieb:
Mike, this works fine (note the trailing comma):
INTERPRET 'say 2*2,'
This one doesn't:
DO
This gives me
Download ooRexx-4.1.3.windows.x86_64.exe (18.1 MB)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/latest/download?source=files
Where is the 32 bit version or do I have to use 64 now??
And the doc link gets the same?!?
Too dumb for all that:
Walter
Thanks anyway
Von: Mark
David's link:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/?
seems to be better than Mark's:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx/files/oorexx/4.1.3/
???
Learning (?):
Walter
--
This SF.net email
--I opened your link (of course)
and it showed a list of 4.1.2
whereas David's starts off with 4.1.3 (tons of ...x stuff though) and then
--32.exe
Regards
Walter Pachl
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com schrieb:
Walter,
The link I posted was:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/oorexx
not so complicated:-)
here I see
Rexx version: REXX-ooRexx_4.1.3(MT) 6.03 4 Jul 2013
--
Walter Pachl
Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com schrieb:
The current version is 4.1.3.
I stand corrected. Thought I always updated when prompted, though .. did I
miss
one (two?)? My
It's really a sort of (distributed) mess:
My Google leads me to
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/REXX
showing this
Weblinks[Bearbeiten]
Regina, eine Open Source Implementierung für Unix und Windows
Open Object Rexx – Fortführung des mittlerweile abgekündigten IBM Object REXX
als
I think this is not very well described in rexref.
I would suggest to add
Before this sentence:
The [] method with no arguments will return the currently associated default
value.
This little description and examples:
Tails for compound variables are normally specified by symbols
in advance
Walter Pachl
--
Shape the Mobile Experience: Free Subscription
Software experts and developers: Be at the forefront of tech innovation.
Intel(R) Software Adrenaline delivers strategic insight and game-changing
--
Walter Pachl
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
wrote:
I am trying to convince someone (you may know who) to try ooRexx.
He asked these questions most of which I cannot reliably answer
Would
Another thank you is in order
Last open Q;
Can ooRexx and other REXXes play well together?
I guess so but I don't know (NOT IBM Object Rexx though - but he
wouldn't have THAT)
Is this guess of mine correct?
Greetings
Walter
Is there a chance to get a 'review' copy to see the changes made before the
stuff is released to the 'public' ?
Thanx Regards
--
Walter Pachl
--
Sponsored by Intel(R) XDK
Develop, test and display web and hybrid apps
downloaded
Installed
Got REXX-ooRexx_4.2.0(MT)_32-bit 6.04 8 Dec 2013
Observation:
Uninstall takes (much) longer than previous
Process says that it REMOVES file associations but clicking on xxx.rex AFTER
the Installation still opens Kedit
(my good old file association)
Have yet to learn what
Indeed I was shocked seeing this but dared not complain
(English?)
Walter
Von: Rick McGuire [mailto:object.r...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 09. Dezember 2013 23:39
An: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Betreff: [Oorexx-devel] Inherited methods tables
The inherited methods section
installer: Finish page
True, but I'd think that non-newbies (which should be larger population, one
hopes) would find it quite helpful.
-Chip-
On 12/17/2013 11:54 Walter Pachl said:
Can we see a draft?
I doubt that readme (showing mosty changes) is useful to a newbie
Walter
*Von:*Mike Cowlishaw
If you give me the urls I shall look at them from my webpage.
--
Walter Pachl
Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com schrieb:
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
wrote:
But non-newbies would know where to look.
We were talking about the disappointed
I encountered an error after installing 4.2 with a THE Macro
As I am NOT owning this macro (or anything of THE)
And Les Koehler can't install 4.2 for some reason
And Mark Hessling has no time available to follow that up
And I don't know enough to even have an idea what the problem could be:
I DO hope that Mark can tell you.
I CAN NOT!
Anyway. This works perfectly with 4.1.1
Von: Rick McGuire [mailto:object.r...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 19. Dezember 2013 13:45
An: Walter Pachl; Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Betreff: Re: [Oorexx-devel] Walter Pachl shared
??
--
Walter Pachl
--
Rapidly troubleshoot problems before they affect your business. Most IT
organizations don't have a clear picture of how application performance
affects their revenue. With AppDynamics, you get 100
Rick, You MAY have an idea where the problem is and I'd be more than happy
to test if the fix, if any, solves the problem.
I have created ticket 1229 with less information than you require.
Mind you: it's not my baby at all.
But it may be a start.
Walter
Von: Rick McGuire
Form there I can get to http://www.rexxla.org/links/
Which has an awful lot of illegal links on it :(
Walter
Von: Mike Cowlishaw [mailto:m...@speleotrove.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 09. Jänner 2014 21:17
An: 'Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List'
Betreff: Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Web
, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
Form there I can get to http://www.rexxla.org/links/
http://www.rexxla.org/links/
Which has an awful lot of illegal links on it :(
Walter
Von: Mike Cowlishaw [mailto:m...@speleotrove.com]
Gesendet
List
Subject: Re: [Oorexx-devel] ooRexx Web Sites
Walter,
I promise to update within a few hours after you send me the html
Great! Thanks.
best regards,
René.
On 10 jan. 2014, at 12:40, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote
Thank you and have a nice weekend
Walter
--
CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services.
Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For
Critical Workloads, Development Environments
May I offer my dropbox to store them (and make them available to those who have
the link)?
Regards
Walter
Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers sahana...@windhorse.biz schrieb:
Once I had a web-site with a few useful ooRexx things on.
Almost all of them got subsumed into the project or became
Open object Rexx shows two similar folders side by side:
Documentation
ooRexx Documentation
all of the files in the former are also in the latter
Do you need a screenshot?
Regards
Walter
--
Flow-based real-time traffic
Rxm
5 March 2014
The distribution of ooRexx contains a function package called rxMath that
provides the computation of trigonometric and some other functions.
Based on the underlying c-library the precision of the returned values is
limited to 16 digits.
Close observation show that
condition('CODE') returns 'SYNTAX' instead of
The detailed identification of the error that caused a SYNTAX condition. This
number is a
nonnegative number in the form nn.nnn. The integer portion is the Rexx major
error number (the
same value as the RC entry). The fractional portion is a subcode
SOLVED:
c=condition('O')
Say condition('CODE')=c~CODE
Reading helps :-)
Sorry
Walter
--
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Again...
Who can help me
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: oorexx-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
[mailto:oorexx-users-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net]
Gesendet: Montag, 28. April 2014 09:02
An: christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
Betreff: AW: [Oorexx-users] How's the shell seeing what Rexx is
is doing internally, and why does it care?
I just checked the subscription list and you are subscribed using
pachl.chello.at http://pachl.chello.at , not christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at .
Rick
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:09 AM, Walter Pachl
what happens if .complex[4,6]
?
Walter Pachl
Mike Cowlishaw m...@speleotrove.com schrieb:
Kewl ... sort of like the generality of loop .. over.
I was hacking on the DO instruction code today in my sandbox and I noticed
something neat in how the code functions. With the little tweak
I'm still curious.
How can complex numbers be compared?
Defined somewhere??
Walter
--
Open source business process management suite built on Java and Eclipse
Turn processes into business applications with Bonita BPM
I am starting to try and do something useful there (encouraged and authorized
by Renee)
On
http://www.rexxla.org/rexxla/faq.html
I find
Rexx FAQ
The Official Rexx FAQ is maintained by Dave Martin.
The following items are those that haven't made it into the Official Rexx FAQ
yet:
None at
I unotice that there are hooks for Presentation abstracts but hardly any
contents (beginning with 2010)
Mark H being the exception-
Is it reasonable to ask for some abstracts or should we get rid of the hooks?
Nothing as bad as a book cover without pages :-(
--
Walter
say value('ProgramFiles(x86)',,'ENVIRONMENT')
gives me
C:\Program Files (x86)
I dare not use the second argument
Walter
Von: Erich Steinböck [mailto:erich.steinbo...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 05. September 2014 14:21
An: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
Betreff: Re:
*/
/* Define to 1 if PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP is a valid value */
/* #undef HAVE_PTHREAD_MUTEX_RECURSIVE_NP */
---
0 Deletions
4 Changes
0 Insertions
10 unchanged lines.
---
--
Walter Pachl
René Jansen
I do have now
d:\_OOTest\trunk containing the entire test suite (downloaded using SVN)
d:\_OOTest\Walter.rex (a first little test group)
Where (else) should I store this program
and how should I invoke it?
Any path or classpath adaptations required?
Rgds
Walter
--
) invoke the suite by typing
rexx testOORexx
hope that helps,
Jon
On 6 October 2014 08:42, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
I do have now
d:\_OOTest\trunk containing the entire test suite (downloaded using SVN)
d:\_OOTest
On 6 October 2014 08:42, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
I do have now
d:\_OOTest\trunk containing the entire test suite (downloaded using SVN)
d:\_OOTest\Walter.rex (a first little test group)
Where (else) should I store this program
on my way
How can I test that Novalue is recognized here:
::method test_3
str='ABC'
self~assertSame(str[A],'C')
it´s this the best way?
::method test_3
Signal On Novalue
self~expectSyntax(16.1)
self~assertSame(str[A],'C')
Can I establish Novalue globally??
Walter Pachl
Ist this a bug?
::method 'test009old'
self~expectSyntax(40.12)
xre = subStr(copies('5C'x,1),'5E+')
::method 'test009'
self~expectSyntax(93.924)
xre = copies('5C'x,1)['5E+']
should the syntax errors be the same?
Should I report such
Fine
thanx
--
Slashdot TV. Videos for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
::method 'test055old'
numeric digits 1
self~assertSame('1E+1 5E+1 ', subStr(2*7 7+7+7+7+7+7 84/4
700-699,6.99-6.00,5*2))
::method 'test055'
numeric digits 1
self~assertSame('1E+1 5E+1 ', 2*7 7+7+7+7+7+7 84/4 700-699[6.99-6.00,5*2])
the 5*2 (10) seems to be
some some
specific principle...for example, demonstrating that the the length is
evaluated under the internal digits setting. The rest of the calculations are
just unnecessary noise.
Rick
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 12:24 PM, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa
I hope that this is a valid one:
1 *-* Say 'AB BC CD DE EF'['1234567890'[1,2],22])
Error. 37 running. D:\_ooTest\w3.rex line. 1: Unexpected ,, ), or ].
Error. 37.2: Unmatched ) in expression.
There’s no ‘)’ in that line :)
BTW I am through with substr- [] and of
at 2:58 PM, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
I hope that this is a valid one:
1 *-* Say 'AB BC CD DE EF'['1234567890'[1,2],22])
Error. 37 running. D:\_ooTest\w3.rex line. 1: Unexpected ,, ), or ].
Error. 37.2: Unmatched
was intended, I just deleted that
one because it looked mostly repetitive.
I'll check this into the build as brackets.testGroup.
Rick
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 3:21 PM, Walter Pachl christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at
mailto:christel.u.w.pa...@chello.at wrote:
Sh_t
Old and blind
Sorry
.rex line. 2: Incorrect call to method.
Error. 93.903: Missing argument in method; argument 2 is required.
I smell an error in the args checkung
Walter Pachl
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com schrieb:
Sorry, already checked in. Now you get to learn a couple of new svn
commands
to put my cookbook on the list
once it it correct.
I've now posted two patches (one, unfortunately, contains the other as well)
How do I add the new testgroup? It does not show up in the diff.
I create a patch containing it as attachment. Is this the right way?
Walter Pachl
Can't zip (never did)
Copied posted
new task?
--
Walter Pachl
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit
just now I used
ooRexx.5.0.0.10650-x86_32.exe
to replace the test interpreter
Uninstall the previous one
ooRexx.5.0.0.10610-x86_32.exe
took ages (10 to 15 minutes)
tons of oodialog files were deleted
--
Walter
--
Meet
There is a testgroup
D:\_ooTest\trunk\ooRexx\base\bif\ERRORTEXT.testGroup
I had my fingers at THIS as early as 2005 !!! (didn't remember but found my
name in it :-)
When trying it now it gets many errors
because a period was added to the errortexts
e.g.
self~assertSame('Failure during
ahhh - my second 0.1 (after the pos doc)
I shall fix this
Thanks
Walter
PS When I reply to such a mail you appear always in the cc
should I remove that?
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Can one see what the last change to a testgroup was (or even all changes over
time)
such as one can in a Wiki?
--
Walter Pachl
--
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
