Just realized (from habits of the past) that I forgot to explicitly ask for
voting (up or down or
abstain)!
So please, if interested in any of these RFEs below, then consider to vote up
or down or abstain by
clicking on the link and then press the + button or the - button. If you want
to
sorting arrays: request for
discussion/thoughts ...
Just realized (from habits of the past) that I forgot to explicitly ask for
voting (up or down or abstain)!
So please, if interested in any of these RFEs below, then consider to vote
up or down or abstain by clicking on the link and then press
Dan:
On 28.08.2012 15:22, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Dan Carter gwcar...@ezlink.com wrote:
Rony, I just tried to vote, but there was no response when clicking the
button. What else must I do to register a vote?
It worked okay for me. I voted up and then back to
On 8/28/2012 09:38 Rony G. Flatscher said:
On 28.08.2012 15:22, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Dan Carter gwcar...@ezlink.com wrote:
Rony, I just tried to vote, but there was no response when clicking the
button. What else must I do to register a vote?
It worked okay
Hi there,
thank you very much for all of your feedback which encouraged me to create the
following two RFEs:
* feature-requests:479 Add a condense method to the Array class:
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/feature-requests/479/ and
* feature-requests:480 Allow the sort/sortWith methods
Yesterday I stumbled over a surprising behaviour of Array's sort, which led me
to open a bug report
https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1107/. Obviously the sorting is working
as designed, hence
the reported behaviour was not accepted as a bug.
Having slept a night over this and thinking
-
Från: Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at
Till: Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Kopia:
Datum: fredag, 24 augusti 2012 12:02
Ämne: [Oorexx-devel] Ad sorting arrays: request for discussion/thoughts ...
Yesterday I stumbled over a surprising
-wien.ac.at
*Till:* Open Object Rexx Developer Mailing List
oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
*Kopia:*
*Datum:* fredag, 24 augusti 2012 12:02
*Ämne:* [Oorexx-devel] Ad sorting arrays: request for discussion/thoughts
...
Yesterday I stumbled over a surprising
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
These are fundamentally different constructs. Do Over actually requests a
new version from the collection which is defined as being non-sparse. The
sort is an in-place modification of the array itself.
REXX used to have a principle of least
Rony G. Flatscher rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at wrote:
Yesterday I stumbled over a surprising behaviour of Array's sort, which
led me to open a bug report https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1107/.
Obviously the sorting is working as designed, hence the reported behaviour
was not accepted as
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, hakan
hexi...@users.sourceforge.netwrote:
I think it's not consistent with
Do s over array
say s
end
These are fundamentally different constructs. Do Over actually requests a
new version from the collection which
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 7:15 AM, hakan
hexi...@users.sourceforge.netwrote:
I think it's not consistent with
Do s over array
say s
end
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Jeremy Nicoll - ml sourceforge
jn.ml.sfrg...@letterboxes.org wrote:
Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Do Over is defined as operating on a snapshot of the collection, so this
is
a requirement for the instruction.
Do you mean because the code inside
13 matches
Mail list logo
