I feel the same way about the parens, but it seems like the solution with
the fewest complications. I'm going to proceed with these two options.
Rick
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 5:12 AM Erich Steinböck
wrote:
> No parens, old rule, in parens, an expression to be evaluated.
>>
> I have a general dis
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 4:14 AM Rony G. Flatscher
wrote:
> 2) seems the most flexible/powerful one.
>
> Constants can be regarded as special attributes that can be accessed in
> the class object and in each of its instances. Currently their value is a
> symbol.
>
> As you are envisioning some sor
>
> No parens, old rule, in parens, an expression to be evaluated.
>
I have a general dislike for required parenthesis, but with the documented
"symbol treated as a constant" feature I see no other way to do this
2) Perform a complete pass through the class objects initializing the
> constants
>
I
2) seems the most flexible/powerful one.
Constants can be regarded as special attributes that can be accessed in the
class object and in each
of its instances. Currently their value is a symbol.
As you are envisioning some sort of a method execution to determine the
constant value, how about
al
I admit this is a feature I've wanted for some time but was not sure how to
actually do it. Since Erich opened the feature request, I thought I should
give it a closer look. I've gotten far enough into this that I believe it
can be done, with some restrictions. There are a few items where decisions
