Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
This is fairly simple to implement for the equals/not equals variants. The
real open question is how to handle the other comparisons such as , ,
etc. These are probably VERY rare situations, but the behavior still needs
to be defined. I see three
This is fairly simple to implement for the equals/not equals variants. The
real open question is how to handle the other comparisons such as , ,
etc. These are probably VERY rare situations, but the behavior still needs
to be defined. I see three obvious paths:
1) Leave them the way they are
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com wrote:
This is fairly simple to implement for the equals/not equals variants. The
real open question is how to handle the other comparisons such as , , etc.
These are probably VERY rare situations, but the behavior still
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Mark Miesfeld miesf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Rick McGuire object.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
This is fairly simple to implement for the equals/not equals variants.
The
real open question is how to handle the other comparisons such as
