Chip Davis wrote:
SysFileTree() otoh, was never intended for interactive use and is more
accurately regarded as a application interface to the file system.
snip
IMHO, of course.
So was that a +1 for my RFE?
--
Michael Lueck
Lueck Data Systems
http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/
On 8/28/2012 08:46 Rony G. Flatscher said:
On 28.08.2012 13:02, Michael Lueck wrote:
Chip Davis wrote:
SysFileTree() otoh, was never intended for interactive use and is more
accurately regarded as a application interface to the file system.
snip
IMHO, of course.
So was that a +1 for my
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Chip Davis c...@aviatrexx.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 08:46 Rony G. Flatscher said:
Just did that and saw that you yourself had not done that vote up.
I had not bumped the RFE because I wanted to initiate a discussion
Actually I think Rony meant Michael had not
On 28.08.2012 19:32, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Chip Davis c...@aviatrexx.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 08:46 Rony G. Flatscher said:
Just did that and saw that you yourself had not done that vote up.
I had not bumped the RFE because I wanted to initiate a discussion
On 8/28/2012 14:08 Rony G. Flatscher said:
On 28.08.2012 19:32, Mark Miesfeld wrote:
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Chip Davis c...@aviatrexx.com wrote:
On 8/28/2012 08:46 Rony G. Flatscher said:
Just did that and saw that you yourself had not done that vote up.
I had not bumped the RFE
Rony G. Flatscher wrote:
Hmm, only after reading this did I conclude that I could do a +1 on your RFE
right there at:
I had no idea that the SF site had a voting system. I was interested in
tabulating peer support that I am not a lunatic for requesting. ;-)
Sincerely,
--
Michael Lueck
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
I agree with you that the reasonable default for the S flags would
have been all files. But it wasn't implemented that way on Unix-like
systems. It's been that way for a long time, probably forever. If we
suddenly changed the behavior, programs like the ones Michael has
Mark Miesfeld wrote:
Opening up a RFE is the only way to get that enhancement. But,
opening up a RFE is not guaranteed to get it.
I took that as a hint that a prior RFE was not on file.
I had to hunt around for the developer links to the SF site. Finally found a
static link to the RFE
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Michael Lueck
mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com wrote:
I had to hunt around for the developer links to the SF site. Finally found
a static link to the RFE tracker at the ooRexx site. (
http://www.oorexx.org/support/ ) Through the many SF redesigns, most
all of the
Historically, commands that listed files, limited the display for one
reason or another. LISTFILE in CMS showed only one minidisk at a
time, 'ls' in Unix (Multics?) omitted 'dot-files', TSO limited you to
the low-level qualifier or a single PDS. The main reason was to save
console
Greetings,
I can not remember if I ever officially opened an enhancement request against
SysFileTree or not, however... ;-)
Some time ago I ran up against unhelpful behavior with SysFileTree on *nix and
the dotted 'hidden' file/directory concept.
I recall it being stated that a new switch
Michael,
Opening up a RFE is the only way to get that enhancement. But,
opening up a RFE is not guaranteed to get it.
--
Mark Miesfeld
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Michael Lueck
mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com wrote:
Greetings,
I can not remember if I ever officially opened an enhancement
12 matches
Mail list logo
