Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0 Beta as 5.0 GA ?

Dear Rick, I just wanted to mention that there is a number of Mac installers available here https://www.dropbox.com/sh/p66c7g01h4jz5ss/AAAZd_Q2yQddrTHagxPo_UiTa?dl=0 I have been doing some work on Mac installers and I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0 Beta as 5.0 GA ?

On Sun, Jun 17, 2018 at 8:21 AM Rony G. Flatscher wrote: > Almost a month has passed since my last posting, so assuming that everyone > is just in "wait and see" > mode. Therefore throwing another stone into the water: how about releasing > the current 5.0 Beta this > coming week? > :) > > Or

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0 Beta as 5.0 GA ?

On Tue, May 22, 2018 at 1:24 PM Jason Martin wrote: > Will rxsock6 stuff be in release? > broke built for me on openindiana. > missing something in cmakelist; > not show stopper though > Undetermined at this point. It has a lot of problems and needs a complete rethink. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0 Beta as 5.0 GA ?

Will rxsock6 stuff be in release? broke built for me on openindiana. missing something in cmakelist; not show stopper though -- Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most engaging tech sites,

[Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0 Beta as 5.0 GA ?

ooRexx 5.0 Beta has been out for quite some time. Besides its great new features it has proved to be stabler than 4.2.0 and much faster in quite a few aspects! As there are no new bugs reported against ooRexx 5.0 Beta, how about releasing it as ooRexx 5.0 GA (general availability)? Companies

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Hi Moritz, I have never heard of those but I am certainly interested. The visibility issue we might address even earlier with a clear part of the ooRexx website (that needs serious revision) dedicated to it. This weekend I am going to make sure that we have all builds available on SF. best

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

On 03/27/2018 06:50 PM, Erich Steinböck wrote: >> >> showstoppers in ooRexx 5.0 ? >> > > René, > except for Windows, Ubuntu, CentOS and a bunch of (now outdated) RPM's I think after the 5.0.0 release we should consider using services such as Travis CI or Appveyor to run our builds. Both are free

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0 for Ubuntu, getting GetCRC32 into ooRexx v5

Greetings ooRexx'ers, Erich Steinböck wrote: Most of the builds we run on Jenkins still don't give access to their built packages So, since my initial builds of ooRexx v5 have run cleanly the ooRexx Test Suite, I am agreeable to connect my VirtualBox VM's to Jenkins. Steps please to do

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Dear developers, I have made a line based installer for MAC and tried it out on my own machines running Sierra and on the Jenkins machine running High Sierra, the latest OS for Mac. On Jenkins Mac Mini used for nightly builds I noted 8.3 million REXX clauses per second running rexxcps.rex. I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Dear Erich, Regarding the Win10 machine, what do I need to do with it before it can be used? I will have to figure out how to have two remote logons on the same IP. If you have info how to use a non standard port on Windows please share it, for Mac it was a real hazzle in Hight Sierra so I

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Hello Enrico, I will reply inline, ok? This discussion is for macOS only. Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, P.O. Jonsson oor...@jonases.se > Am 29.03.2018 um 16:09 schrieb Enrico Sorichetti : > > Hello everybody, > > where to install things almost always resulted in a flame

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

> > I can volunteer to try all samples. I can do it on Mac, Windows 7 and 10 > (and possibly Win XP). Yes, please check out all samples. Can you also please check whether you can reproduce bugs:#1532 and bugs:#1533

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Hello everybody, where to install things almost always resulted in a flame war, I speak for the *ix side… why not leave things as they were once upon a time ??? intall to /opt/oorexx if nothing is specified the advantage is that no root priviliges are needed no issues about the subdirectory

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Dear Erich, I have had some progress lately. 1. I have a complete HowTo to be put on the WIKI for Mac users. I am now confident in building ooRexx manually for the Mac. It will need an adaptation of the CMakeLists.txt I will propose the changes later. Basically it is what Enrico proposed

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Hi Erich, Yes, I agree we should work on these things. We’ll have to look into the ooDialog errors and I am afraid I am not the one to do that. I will however, make sure that all the jenkins builds will reach SF - and I promise to do that this week. Best regards, René. On 27 Mar 2018, at

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

> > showstoppers in ooRexx 5.0 ? > René, except for Windows, Ubuntu, CentOS and a bunch of (now outdated) RPM's built by Erico, we have no builds. Most of the builds we run on Jenkins still don't give access to their built packages Also we have no doc or devel builds for Unix (and I really don't

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Greetings ooRexx'ers, Rony G. Flatscher wrote: If you have BSF4ooRexx then there is probably no need for such a functionality, you can probably use "|java.util.zip.CRC32" for that purpose. It should be fairly straightforward to transcribe e.g. the code in

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

On 23.03.2018 11:43, Michael Lueck wrote: > Greetings ooRexx'ers, > > rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote: >> >> Would it be a bad idea to freeze a revision one of these days, have a close >> look at it,and try to >> bring it to GA. > > > Why is this still tagged "next release" since a year ago... > > "Add

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Greetings ooRexx'ers, rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote: Would it be a bad idea to freeze a revision one of these days, have a close look at it,and try to bring it to GA. Why is this still tagged "next release" since a year ago... "Add GetCRC32 Rexx DLL call to ooRexx"

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

No showstoppers in my code base or in the code bases of my clients... I concur with a freeze and release. Mark On 03/22/2018 04:34 PM, rvjansen@... wrote: Hi ooRexx developers, As we have the symposium next week the question pops up (like it did last year), if ooRexx 5.0 is ready to be

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

I am not aware of any showstoppers. I vote for a freeze and release. Gil B. On 3/22/2018 7:34 PM, rvjan...@xs4all.nl wrote: Hi ooRexx developers, As we have the symposium next week the question pops up (like it did last year), if ooRexx 5.0 is ready to be released. In other words, are there

[Oorexx-devel] Releasing 5.0

Hi ooRexx developers, As we have the symposium next week the question pops up (like it did last year), if ooRexx 5.0 is ready to be released. In other words, are there real showstoppers in the recent revisions? I am sure we are all aware that it is quite some time since we released an