Re: [Oorexx-devel] object, class, metaclass... Big picture ?

2011-08-08 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jean-Louis, On 08.08.2011 14:40, Jean-Louis Faucher wrote: > About ~send, I was focusing on the search order for method selection, > and I found the answer in rexxref 4.2.5. > There is no reference to metaclass there, so I assume that the methods > of a metaclass are not visible from an object.

Re: [Oorexx-devel] object, class, metaclass... Big picture ?

2011-08-08 Thread Jean-Louis Faucher
Thanks a lot Rony ! About ~send, I was focusing on the search order for method selection, and I found the answer in rexxref 4.2.5. There is no reference to metaclass there, so I assume that the methods of a metaclass are not visible from an object. Honestly, I can't say it's still very clear for

Re: [Oorexx-devel] object, class, metaclass... Big picture ?

2011-08-08 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jean-Louis, overlooked the "send" question: in ooRexx the defined methods and the messages (represented by the tilde/twiddle/"~") are represented in their own ooRexx classes. So if in a Rexx program the "~" is encountered a message object (an instance of the class "Message") is created. Howeve

Re: [Oorexx-devel] object, class, metaclass... Big picture ?

2011-08-08 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Hi Jean-Louis, it seems that Rick is currently not online, so I try to give some shots, hoping they may help a little bit. [One problem in OO is the terminology, which sometimes comes into ones way (instead of clarifying concepts, sometimes they obfuscate them, unfortunately). There are quite a f

[Oorexx-devel] object, class, metaclass... Big picture ?

2011-08-08 Thread Jean-Louis Faucher
I try to understand the underlying model for object, class, metaclass (source excerpt at the end of the mail). Not easy... I can't find a suitable definition for the ??? below. Extracted from rexxref : 5.1.1 The Object class is the root of the class hierarchy. The instance methods of the Object