[Oorexx-devel] Starting to think about WSC

2009-05-02 Thread Rick McGuire
Ok, since I wasn't tied down with new bug reports this morning, I thought I'd start looking at the orxscript stuff again and start putting together a plan for what we're going to do with this. This is just sort of a random collection of thoughts right now, but I thought I'd put some of these thing

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Starting to think about WSC

2009-05-02 Thread Mark Miesfeld
I'm going to be a little hit and miss here and will probably respond in a couple of different posts. On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Rick McGuire wrote: > 2)  Compatibility.  I'm not sure what to do here.  I spent some time > reading the 3.2.0 WSH docs this morning, and I found a few things > qu

Re: [Oorexx-devel] Starting to think about WSC

2009-05-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Rick McGuire wrote: > Ok, since I wasn't tied down with new bug reports this morning, I > thought I'd start looking at the orxscript stuff again and start > putting together a plan for what we're going to do with this. This is > just sort of a random collection of thoughts right now, but I though

[Oorexx-devel] Example of a rather complex WSH application implemented in ooRexx (Re: Starting to think about WSC

2009-05-02 Thread Rony G. Flatscher
Just in case, backward compatibility is tested eventually with "real-life" WSH apps. Here is one that queries the OLE interfaces of a given COM class and renders them such that one can create nice printouts of them. If you check the "compact" mode than you get a reference card kind of rendering. A