It is intended to be without padding as an argument.
Rick
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 10:54 AM Erich Steinböck
wrote:
> rexxref documents the new MutableBuffer method []= with three args,
> including the pad, in the brackets.
>
> The supposedly equivalent replaceAt() method does have the pad as its last
> argument.
>
> But []= doesn't actually accept the third pad argument and the source code
> has a comment "this is just replaceAt with the default pad".
>
> Do we treat this as a doc bug? Do we want []= to be without pad?
> ___
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>
___
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
