It is intended to be without padding as an argument. Rick
On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 10:54 AM Erich Steinböck <erich.steinbo...@gmail.com> wrote: > rexxref documents the new MutableBuffer method []= with three args, > including the pad, in the brackets. > > The supposedly equivalent replaceAt() method does have the pad as its last > argument. > > But []= doesn't actually accept the third pad argument and the source code > has a comment "this is just replaceAt with the default pad". > > Do we treat this as a doc bug? Do we want []= to be without pad? > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
