Re: [opam-devel] [RFC] OPAM files as *the* OCaml package metadata format

2016-04-16 Thread Daniel Bünzli
Le vendredi, 15 avril 2016 à 20:40, Bryce Glover a écrit : > I’m just a lurker here, but I just couldn’t help but bring this up: shouldn’t > we make OPAM installable system-wide per the original intent of issue #1950 > (https://github.com/ocaml/opam/issues/1950) before we start making it so that

Re: [opam-devel] [RFC] OPAM files as *the* OCaml package metadata format

2016-04-16 Thread Török Edwin
On 04/16/2016 12:28, Daniel Bünzli wrote: > Le vendredi, 15 avril 2016 à 20:40, Bryce Glover a écrit : >> I’m just a lurker here, but I just couldn’t help but bring this up: >> shouldn’t we make OPAM installable system-wide per the original intent of >> issue #1950 (https://github.com/ocaml/opam/

Re: [opam-devel] [RFC] OPAM files as *the* OCaml package metadata format

2016-04-16 Thread Daniel Bünzli
Le samedi, 16 avril 2016 à 12:45, Török Edwin a écrit : > This sounds very useful, I'd be interested in trying this out when you have > some (even pre-alpha) code ready. No precise plan, only some ideas at the moment, so don't hold your breath. Just trying to put the right bits at the right pl

Re: [opam-devel] specifying environment variables in opam package

2016-04-16 Thread Ashish Agarwal
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:56 PM, Louis Gesbert wrote: > Le vendredi 15 avril 2016, 14:33:15 Ashish Agarwal a écrit : > > I noticed that opam sets PERL5LIB. Can someone explain why. > > The answer is here: https://github.com/ocaml/opam/pull/755 Got it. Thanks. FYI, my use case is outside OPAM's