Bill,
See
https://github.com/GabrielDosReis/open-axiom/commit/04be6d65c9bae10780f463c23a14922249c187de
I don't know that your specific scenario works out of the box, since
OpenAxiom requires separating build directory from source directory, hence
you might run into load directory issues.
If you h
Gaby,
Thank you very much for the explanation. I understand and appreciate
that OpenAxiom is moving away from depending on Lisp, I just did not
know quite how much! I can live with re-running make. In fact I have
been doing that and it seems that the dependencies are sufficiently
fine grained tha
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 5:10 PM, Bill Page
wrote:
> Gaby,
>
> I am not quite sure what you mean by "separately load it"? What I
> have in mind is to compile a boot file to Lisp and then load it -
> typically replacing some existing code in a running system.
OpenAxiom has two ways of handling B
Gaby,
I am not quite sure what you mean by "separately load it"? What I
have in mind is to compile a boot file to Lisp and then load it -
typically replacing some existing code in a running system. I do this
quite frequently when debugging or testing some limited change in
FriCAS. I was surprise
Hi Bill,
Is the idea that you would like to change a BOOT file, compile it, and then
separately load it?
Or just read in the interpreted form of a BOOT file?
-- Gaby
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 7:56 PM, Bill Page
wrote:
> Is there a way to do this in OpenAxiom? A typical use case is when I
> am d
