On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:52 PM, Ben Ostrowsky b...@esilibrary.com wrote:
Actually, the README was a bit out of date anyway, so here's a better patch
that now mentions ubuntu-karmic among other options.
Applied to trunk through rel_1_6_0 with thanks!
--
Mike Rylander
| VP, Research and
I've gone back through my pending-patch list, and I believe I've
applied all that are safe to apply. There are 3 or 4 remaining, but I
don't feel safe applying them without a chance to test, and we're
already past critical mass on bug fixes for 1.6.0.1. Dan Scott got a
whole pile of new and
Mike Rylander said the following on 02/01/2010 10:57 AM:
I've gone back through my pending-patch list, and I believe I've
applied all that are safe to apply. There are 3 or 4 remaining, but I
don't feel safe applying them without a chance to test, and we're
already past critical mass on bug
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Bill Ott b...@grpl.org wrote:
Mike Rylander said the following on 02/01/2010 10:57 AM:
I've gone back through my pending-patch list, and I believe I've
applied all that are safe to apply. There are 3 or 4 remaining, but I
don't feel safe applying them
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 10:32 AM, Doug Kyle dk...@grpl.org wrote:
[snip]
It appears this query is missing items that have never transited. I'm
thinking that is because the left join on action.transit_copy returns
nulls
where no transit exists, and the HAVING clause
MAX(circ.checkin_time)
Hi Mike,
It's a small thing, but any chance of incorporating the fix for
MARC21slim2MODS32.xsl which I posted about on 1/15? I understand if it is
better to evaluate all the changes to the LOC version and incorporate them at
once at a later date.
Thanks,
Dan
--
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dan Wells d...@calvin.edu wrote:
Hi Mike,
It's a small thing, but any chance of incorporating the fix for
MARC21slim2MODS32.xsl which I posted about on 1/15? I understand if it is
better to evaluate all the changes to the LOC version and incorporate them at
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 13:49 -0500, Dan Wells wrote:
Hi Mike,
It's a small thing, but any chance of incorporating the fix for
MARC21slim2MODS32.xsl which I posted about on 1/15? I understand if it is
better to evaluate all the changes to the LOC version and incorporate them at
once at a
On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 10:57 -0500, Mike Rylander wrote:
I've gone back through my pending-patch list, and I believe I've
applied all that are safe to apply. There are 3 or 4 remaining, but I
don't feel safe applying them without a chance to test, and we're
already past critical mass on bug
Thanks for the explanation. Waiting on this is fine with me, I just wanted to
make sure it was missed intentionally.
Dan
On 2/1/2010 at 2:27 PM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Dan Wells d...@calvin.edu wrote:
Hi Mike,
It's a small thing, but any
Another minor bug in 1.6 is the lack of a defined 'MERGE_USERS' permission in
the permission.perm_list table (needed for the patron account merging
functionality). I had mentioned it on IRC but not officially reported it
anywhere, so I have now opened a bug for it.
Dan
On 2/1/2010 at 10:57
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Dan Wells d...@calvin.edu wrote:
Another minor bug in 1.6 is the lack of a defined 'MERGE_USERS' permission in
the permission.perm_list table (needed for the patron account merging
functionality). I had mentioned it on IRC but not officially reported it
12 matches
Mail list logo
