On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Thomas Berezansky tsb...@mvlc.org wrote:
Hopefully without the HTML wrapping? ;)
Oh, for heaven's sake... yes. The Google netbook is pretty awesome, but
leads to some wacky workarounds.
-- Two functions for updating copy information (call number label and
Hi,
On Apr 14, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Dan Scott wrote:
I would probably just bash out something like:
UPDATE asset.call_number SET label = 'MYS ' || label
WHERE id IN (
SELECT acn.id
FROM asset.call_number acn
INNER JOIN asset.copy ac ON ac.call_number = acn.id
INNER
Kevin,
This is great stuff. I'm not (yet) familiar with Check, but the approach
looks sane and I like the unit tests. (I'd say the fact that 95% of the
patch is actually unit test code is a really good sign). I hope to apply
the patch soon and take it for a spin.
kbeswick++
-b
On Mon, Apr
Hello,
Attached are two patches. The first one contains some unit tests for
the first half of opensrf.js. These make use of the DOH (Dojo
Objective Harness) framework that Dan Scott had put into place in this
commit: http://svn.open-ils.org/trac/OpenSRF/changeset/2217/
The second patch contains
Hi,
On Apr 14, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Dan Scott wrote:
You snipped out the concerns I expressed about testing and maintaining
these functions. Say what you will about the state of testing of the
existing database functions, at least there's a chance that they will be
exercised and deficiencies
Hi,
On Apr 14, 2011, at 4:07 PM, Galen Charlton wrote:
The routines in question are being actively used now, and would not stop
being used just because they get added to core. In fact, if they're
sufficiently useful, they'll be tested more. Even absent a formal test plan,
it beats the
