Quoting Bill Erickson beric...@gmail.com:
I see your point about the doldrums, though. A week is probably too long.
Let's push the beta cut-off up to the 20th?
I know that where I am, we'd like more time, but a couple of days
probably won't make that much difference. I dont' have a problem
Bill,
First, thanks for putting out a timeline.
I am a little concerned about the pre-beta feature freeze. In the past,
the merge deadline for features has always been whatever makes it into the
beta release, and I don't see cutting that back by a week helping things
to get done faster -- we
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote:
Bill,
First, thanks for putting out a timeline.
I am a little concerned about the pre-beta feature freeze. In the past,
the merge deadline for features has always been whatever makes it into the
beta release, and I
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Bill Erickson beric...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bill,
First, thanks for putting out a timeline.
I am a little concerned about the pre-beta feature freeze. In the past,
the merge deadline
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Bill Erickson beric...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Mike Rylander mrylan...@gmail.com
wrote:
Bill,
First, thanks for putting out a timeline.
I am a little
Hi Bill,
Dates look reasonable to me. Having gone through the alpha cutting
stage myself now, I may agree with you that very few people tend to
test them and provide feedback with the majority often waiting for the
beta when more features have been added of note or substance. Or you
know...
