Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Mike Rylander
Tim, That looks like a good set of enhancements. Just one comment and one question: * I suspect that the DISK 15.1 anomaly is caused by an extra space between DISK and 15.1, which gets it an extra pile of zeroes. * Do you plan to leave the existing sort label infrastructure there, and use

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Tim Spindler
Elaine, We have an issue from our migration where parts are represented in multiple ways (v. 1, vol. 1, volume 1, v1, etc.). With this development, access to this would still be controlled by a permission so each implementation would decide who has permissions to make changes on this. Tim On

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Hardy, Elaine
...@list.georgialibraries.org] On Behalf Of Tim Spindler Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:37 PM To: Evergreen Development Discussion List Cc: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development Elaine, We have an issue from our migration where parts

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Tim Spindler
-ils-dev-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org [mailto: open-ils-dev-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Tim Spindler *Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2013 2:37 PM *To:* Evergreen Development Discussion List *Cc:* Evergreen Discussion Group *Subject:* Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL

Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development

2013-01-29 Thread Hardy, Elaine
Discussion Group Cc: Evergreen Development Discussion List Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] Planned Parts Development Elaine, This was actually how it is represented in the Parts field because our previous system had used a free text field for Volume that is equivalent to parts