+1
I'm excited.
Dan
On 8/17/2011 at 1:20 PM, Bill Erickson erick...@esilibrary.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley wrote:
Bill's merge seems to work well to me. I haven't come across any
features that don't work in this branch. Let's do this!
Hi
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote:
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:09PM -0400, Bill Erickson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley wrote:
Bill's merge seems to work well to me. I haven't come across any
features that don't
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley wrote:
Bill's merge seems to work well to me. I haven't come across any
features that don't work in this branch. Let's do this!
Hi All,
As discussed in the IRC dev meeting yesterday, I'd like to make an
official call for yeas
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:20:09PM -0400, Bill Erickson wrote:
On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 03:02:57PM -0400, Lebbeous Fogle-Weekley wrote:
Bill's merge seems to work well to me. I haven't come across any
features that don't work in this branch. Let's do this!
Hi All,
As discussed in the