In the Evergreen 2.2 RC1 I just installed, how do I enable TPAC by default?
Would that be a good idea at this point, or is it too early?
To clarify my own words, is TPAC stable and tested well enough for a production
environment?
Alexey Lazar
PALS
Information System Developer and Integrator
For 2.2, the goal was to replace the original slimpac (simple OPAC) with
Tpac and it is there now as the simple catalog. However, there is still
ongoing work to further enhance and refine various aspects and add
features to Tpac before it will fully replace the JSPac. The projected
time
Hi, Justin.
I uncommented this whole section, including the line you mentioned:
LocationMatch ^/$
SetHandler perl-script
PerlHandler OpenILS::WWW::Redirect
Options +ExecCGI
PerlSendHeader On
#PerlSetVar OILSRedirectSkin default
# OILSRedirectDepth defaults to the depth of
This is actually a clarification I've been meaning to suggest to the
install documentation. It should say make
STAFF_CLIENT_STAMP_ID=rel_2_2_rc1 install since the client we provide
looks for that stamp. A quick fix is to cd /openils/var/web/xul and
then ln -sf rel_2_2 rel_2_2_rc1.
Cheers
On
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 02:53:28PM +, Duimovich, George wrote:
Hello Dan / Lebbeous,
Regarding the GSOC proposal on Overhauling internationalization
support in Evergreen here:
http://evergreen-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=dev:summer_of_coding_ideas
Are there any examples in the
Hi all,
While discussing the proposed 2.3 release schedule (below) in the IRC dev
meeting yesterday, Jeff pointed out that the GSOC code-complete deadline of
Aug. 13 will likely put most/all of the GSOC code out of the running for
inclusion in Evergreen 2.3 (using the proposed schedule). The
On May 24, 2012 12:19 PM, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich
alexey.la...@mnsu.edu wrote:
Generally, I think all contributed code should go through the equal
review procedures and not specially prioritized, unless we are talking
about critical fixes, but can be decided on a case-by-case basis or
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:28:08PM -0400, Dan Scott wrote:
On May 24, 2012 12:19 PM, Lazar, Alexey Vladimirovich
alexey.la...@mnsu.edu wrote:
Generally, I think all contributed code should go through the equal
review procedures and not specially prioritized, unless we are talking
about
Hi,
On May 24, 2012, at 4:35 PM, Bill Erickson wrote:
IIRC, there was a +1 from Galen in IRC as well. Given the lack of objection,
I'll consider this case closed. The release schedule stands.
Confirmed... +1
Regards,
Galen
--
Galen Charlton
Director of Support and Implementation
Equinox
