On Saturday 26 July 2008 10:52 Mike Rylander wrote:
We've had requests in the past for the ability to use an item's price
as the max fine amount on a circulation, instead of a predefined
amount. Because of how rules are defined and chosen in Evergreen
today, the solution to this request had
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 July 2008 10:52 Mike Rylander wrote:
[snip]
* The config.rule_max_fine table gets a new boolean column called
is_percent which defaults to false
* The IDL (and, for good measure, the storage server's
On Sunday 27 July 2008 11:24 Mike Rylander wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Mike Rylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 26 July 2008 10:52 Mike Rylander wrote:
I think it's a great addition. I
On Sunday 27 July 2008 11:21 Mike Rylander wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 26 July 2008 10:52 Mike Rylander wrote:
Next question is ... how far back do we backport this. I would lobby
for 1.2.3.0, but not to strongly.
Well,
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Mike Rylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 26 July 2008 10:52 Mike Rylander wrote:
[snip]
* The config.rule_max_fine table gets a new boolean column called
is_percent which
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:34 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 27 July 2008 11:21 Mike Rylander wrote:
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Saturday 26 July 2008 10:52 Mike Rylander wrote:
Next question is ... how far back do we
We've had requests in the past for the ability to use an item's price
as the max fine amount on a circulation, instead of a predefined
amount. Because of how rules are defined and chosen in Evergreen
today, the solution to this request had not presented itself in a
clear and consistent manner.
