On Saturday 26 July 2008 9:57 Mike Rylander wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Mike Rylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
After supposing for a few days, here are 2 patches which remove the
normalization (there was
Hi Mike:
The database location is good. Is there any reason you chose to go
with the ll_ll form for language/region in the code field, rather
than the ll-LL form currently used for translations? The latter form
is also used by Dojo, which would be handy for locazing dates, times,
and currencies.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Mike:
The database location is good. Is there any reason you chose to go
with the ll_ll form for language/region in the code field, rather
than the ll-LL form currently used for translations? The latter form
is also used
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Dan Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoughts on the following proposal for the (rapidly approaching) 1.4 release?
I'm particularly interested in the plumbing for supported default
locales. We could conceivably have one set of locales supported for
the OPAC,
Thoughts on the following proposal for the (rapidly approaching) 1.4 release?
I'm particularly interested in the plumbing for supported default
locales. We could conceivably have one set of locales supported for
the OPAC, and a different (probably smaller) set of locales supported
for the staff
