Re: SPAM: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] osrfHash: alternative implementation

2008-03-29 Thread Bill Erickson
Scott McKellar wrote: --- Mike Rylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip I've been mulling this over for a couple days, and I've got to disagree with Bill. IFF mid-iteration changes (removal, in particular, of a key) can be handled transparently and safely, and that guarantee can be carved

SPAM: Re: [OPEN-ILS-DEV] osrfHash: alternative implementation

2008-03-28 Thread Scott McKellar
--- Mike Rylander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Bill Erickson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Scott McKellar wrote: snip I can't get too worked up over hash-key ordering ... associative arrays don't have a guaranteed order in other implementation that I know of.