+1 for the use of .adoc.
I use the .adoc extension as it is a reminder to me what language I am
writing in. As a Windows Notepad++ user this also allows the syntax to
show, which is very valuable when writing.
Lynn Floyd
mailto:lfl...@andersonlibrary.org lfl...@andersonlibrary.org
+1 to using either .adoc or .asciidoc instead of .txt.
Jim
Jim Keenan
Library Applications Supervisor
jkee...@cwmars.orgmailto:jkee...@cwmars.org
508-755-3323 x23
C/W MARS
67 Millbrook St., Suite 201
Worcester, MA 01606
P Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Yamil Suarez ysua...@berklee.edu wrote:
Has anyone taught their copy of Notepad or Notepad++ to automatically open
these suffixes? I suspect it will be very easy to do. Though we might want
to document the process on our wiki.
To do it in Notepad++:
[1]
I'm not active in documenting but for what it's worth I use .adoc
extensions for SC LENDS' internal git hub materials and have taught Macs to
use it natively with TextWrangler / BBEdit. I can't imagine it's much
harder on Windows with Notepad++.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 5:28 PM, Yamil Suarez
I am still on the fence, but I don't mind being in the minority and feel free
to proceed if you guys have plurality.
Has anyone tested if the two suffixes are both converted to HTML on GitHub? (I
believe someone has.)
Has anyone taught their copy of Notepad or Notepad++ to automatically open
+1, this makes sense to me. I think this is a good step in making the github
docs workflow easier to use. I never edit the doc files on a local computer
and if I did I don't think notepad++ would care about the extension change. I
vote for .adoc as the extension, just because it is shorter.
