Hi All,
Since participating in the Hackfest, I'm curious about this... As with the
attached example, I see many instances on the General email list that a very
busy contributor generously takes the time to give a comprehensive answer to a
question. Would it be beneficial simply to add the
We probably should put a really thorough documentation of this somewhere
with examples. I lean towards the WIKI personally but opinions may vary.
To be clear a really good write up will take a lot more than the relatively
quick answer I gave here. :)
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:20 AM, June
Yamil,
I would argue that the documentation for this isn't incomplete or incorrect
but maybe a third category of could be more robust. When you get into
matchpoints and circ limits it can be pretty confusing, especially if
libraries need to clean up messy migrations.
Yes, we must move over all
+1 to this idea.
I've also encountered several instances where the official documentation
exists, and is correct, but is just too brief for me to understand. A few
times I've been lucky enough to find a consortium that's documented the same
feature/process in a more detailed way. It seems
