I am trying to overlay full marc records for DVDs on to a short record. The
short record has the UPC in field 020 and the proper record has it in field
024. Is it possible to write a match set that will overlay this, or is it
the case that only 020 can overwrite 020 and nothing else?
Anne Murray
On 2013-01-04, at 10:41 , Galen Charlton g...@esilibrary.com wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:07 AM, Bill Erickson ber...@esilibrary.com wrote:
If we decide to change, I would also vote for the Ubuntu-style naming scheme
Thomas describes. (IIRC, Jason S. was also a proponent of this
On 2013-01-04, at 14:52 , Dan Scott d...@coffeecode.net wrote:
On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 03:21:08PM -0500, Rogan Hamby wrote:
I would disagree. It's not this one:
http://www.open-ils.org/dokuwiki/doku.php?id=versioning
But, I would propose that we are following one based largely on the
Hi Alexey,
I think a lot of the Is it going to be a huge pain to upgrade? Or is it
just a minor upgrade? angst would be diminished if we (devs and release
managers) did a better job of communicating expectations about each
upcoming release. We pledged to do this at EGConf 2012 and had a good
On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 02:07:58PM -0500, Kathy Lussier wrote:
Hi Alexey,
I think a lot of the Is it going to be a huge pain to upgrade? Or is it
just a minor upgrade? angst would be diminished if we (devs and release
managers) did a better job of communicating expectations about each
When downloading RDA records, the 264 field does not appear in the
catalog. The work around is to add a 260 field. Has any library found a
way to view the 264 in the Evergreen catalog?
Thank you
--
Sue Graziano
Collection Development Librarian
Santa Cruz Public Libraries
117 Union St.
Santa
Hi Sue,
I'd like to mention this thread discussing 264 and RDA:
http://markmail.org/message/dtubcqbpkt3xil6s
And also this bug ticket that is being used to track further discussion
and ongoing work: https://bugs.launchpad.net/evergreen/+bug/1071505
My comment (#8) on the bug ticket
